From: somms@mit.edu
To: somms-digest@mit.edu
Subject: Soundgarden Digest, Wednesday, 19 Mar 1997
Reply-To: somms@mit.edu
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 1997 00:52:13 EST
Sender: saperl

 
The Soundgarden Digest:  Wednesday, 19 Mar 1997

listadmin:    saperl@mit.edu
list archive: http://www.sgi.net/soundgarden/archive/

TO UNSUBSCRIBE: email saperl@mit.edu

Today's Topics:
 

                                ev knowing aw
                      Re: say hello 2 heaven/andy wood
                      Re: Say hello 2 heaven/andy wood
                       4th of July live at Reading 95
                        Re: like feathers in sand...
                            RE: soundgarden rules
                            Re: soundgarden rules
                        Re: like feathers in sand...
                Re: The Kaytrang/Taylor Bootleg Trading Post
                             Chris-the guitarist
                      Re: Say hello 2 heaven/andy wood
                     Re: 4th of July live at Reading 95
                            Re: soundgarden rules
                            Re: soundgarden rules
                       Re: comin' up on your right...
                   Re: I have to speak up in favor of....
                            Re: soundgarden rules
                    Re: The Kaytrang Bootleg Trading Post
                     I have to speak up in favor of....
                            Re: soundgarden rules
                       Re: comin' up on your right...
                            Re: soundgarden rules
                              Re: ev knowing aw
                                Club Lingerie
                     Temple/Andrew/Matt/Real PJ History
                       Re: comin' up on your right...
                    Re: The Kaytrang Bootleg Trading Post
                                Re: Rhinosaur
                            Re: soundgarden rules
                   Re: Temple/Andrew/Matt/Real PJ History
                   Re: stole a thousand beggar's chains..
                   Re: I have to speak up in favor of....
                            Re: soundgarden rules
                   Re: Temple/Andrew/Matt/Real PJ History
                            Re: soundgarden rules
                                  just a q?
                            re: soundgarden rule
                       Re: Burden in my Hand UK Import
                             what does it mean?
                              Re: ev knowing aw
              correction of my previous post fu*k up, sorry =)
                                Re: just a q?
                            re: soundgarden rule
                     Re: 4th of July live at Reading 95
                           Re: what does it mean?
                        Re: The Bootleg Trading Post
                           Re: what does it mean?
                   Re: Temple/Andrew/Matt/Real PJ History
                                Re: Rhinosaur
                   a whole bunch of diff message responses
                           Re: what does it mean?
                        Re: The Bootleg Trading Post
                                sonicignition
                            Re: soundgarden rules
                        Re: The Bootleg Trading Post
                  singing golden words in a broken voice...
                           Re: what does it mean?
                   Re: Temple/Andrew/Matt/Real PJ History
                                puss 'n boots
                  Re: The Soundgarden Bootleg Trading Post
                            Re: soundgarden rules
                              SG/Living Colour

------------------------------------------------------------

From: Rosario Fusca <rosario@c031.aone.net.au>
Subject: ev knowing aw

i heard that eddie didnt know him at all, he got a tape given to him by
jack irons that had some music on it. eddie decided he liked the music
so he went to seattle to form pj and worked on totd as a sot of side
project. thats just what i heard though. ruth

------------------------------

Subject: Re: say hello 2 heaven/andy wood
From: kalyssa@juno.com (Katie E Williams)


On Mon, 17 Mar 1997 21:33:07, -0500 endless_nameless@prodigy.com (GRRL
NIKI   FREER) writes:
> for those of you who own the mother love bone album 'thing' with 
>both _shine_ and _apple_ on it, you'll note that there's a song andy 
>wrote called "stargazer." well, as i was listening to "say hello 2 
>heaven" for the 800th time the other night, i read the lyrics sheet 
>along with it and the line "poor stargazer/she's got no tears in her 
>eyes" hit me. the song by andy is about a she, and this line from 
>SH2H is also a 'she' line. "is there a point here?"

(okay, going out on a limb here) I've never heard the song by Mother Love
Bone so I may be incredibly wrong depending on what the song's about.... but the line that Chris wrote may mean something about how there isn't anyone to feel the intended emotion in the song "stargazer", ("stargazer"
being the "she" in the lyrics) ... Since Andy wrote the lyrics, he's the
only one that really knew what the song orignally was supposed to mean. 
Now that he's dead, however, the true feelings and emotions that were
supposed to be expressed (the tears) can no longer fully be a part of
the song.  The song is more empty without Andy.  Anyone else who tries
to perform that song isn't going to have the real tears, or emotions,
that he had.  Does that make any sense? I hope I'm at least kinda on the
right track.   Of course I could be totally wrong and have tons of people
reply back asking me what the hell I was thinking. =)

~Katie

------------------------------

From: Deborah Baker <deborah@rustycage.u-net.com>
Subject: Re: Say hello 2 heaven/andy wood

Niki wrote:

>for those of you who own the mother love bone album 'thing' with 
>both _shine_ and _apple_ on it, you'll note that there's a song andy 
>wrote called "stargazer." well, as i was listening to "say hello 2 
>heaven" for the 800th time the other night, i read the lyrics sheet 
>along with it and the line "poor stargazer/she's got no tears in her 
>eyes" hit me. the song by andy is about a she, and this line from 
>SH2H is also a 'she' line. 

> yeah, i'm thinking, 'is this kind of a mention of andy himself in a 
>song chris blatantly wrote about him, or is this just some kind of 
>accident (lack of better word here) <possibly subconsiously?> that 
>coincidentally had a lot to do with andy's writings?'

I'm pretty sure Stargazer is a reference (in both songs) to Andy's
girlfriend, Xana.

UKDeb


------------------------------

From: "V. Anselmo" <vikki@u.washington.edu>
Subject: 4th of July live at Reading 95

4th of July was played to perfection at the Reading Festival 95.  Since
the guys hadn't touched this song throughout their 94 tour, I was stunned  
and euphoric to hear it live.  The festival takes place in August.  Since 
I'm originally from New York, August conjures a feeling of stagnance and
perspiration.  But August at the Reading Festival provided an unusually
cold and windy night, even by England standards.  The show began as the
sun was setting.  An hour later, the beauty that is the slow building  
magnitude of '4th of July' was floating on the wind over the large field 
during the kind of cold summer night I'd always envisioned when listening 
to the song on my headset.  It's a difficult song to offer to a large,
unfamiliar crowd.  (/me waves to those who experienced the song at the
Showbox to contrast the moment for us).  SG have only playing the song 
twice, to my knowledge -- once in a large field and then in a small club
...and never since.  Kerrang recent asked Chris which song he's most proud 
of.  He answered, "Oh, that's tough.  4th Of July is probably the one I'm
particularly proud of, because it always felt like it was entirely my own.   
If a song means something to you and a whole bunch of people respond to
it, then it sort of changes your idea about it.  And if I think a song's  
really great and other people think it's shit, then I almost start liking 
it more because I feel like I knew something they didn't."

- -Vikki :)







------------------------------

From: sknauf@HK.Super.NET
Subject: Re: like feathers in sand...

At 03:31 PM 3/18/97 +1000, blind dog wrote:

>	as much as I'd like to agree with you foxx ('t&t' is *way* cooler
>than 'rhinosaur'), I have my doubts that 'rhinosaur' is going to be the
>next single released from _dotu_. in fact, I don't think there will be any
>more singles taken from _dotu_ at all.  we've had reports of radio
>stations saying "this is the hot new song from soundgarden!" in the past,
>but that doesn't mean that the song in question will actually be packaged
>and released in the stores.  

I agree with Justin, but for different reasons. I don't think 'Rhinosaur' is
the next single, simply b/c the next prospective single would have been
integrated in the setlist a few times, but as far as I know, SG never played
that song live during their last tour (unlike bimh, butow, and pn)


... and before I leave, I'd like to congratulate our listadmin on getting
over 300 000 hits on his site!! 

way to go! :)


sabrina


------------------------------

From: Mercyhurst Prep Library <mercylib@erie.net>
Subject: RE: soundgarden rules

I'm going to hazard a guess, after re-reading the original message that the
writer meant that EV didn't do any of the WRITING for Temple, just some
patched in vocals.  IMHO Temple was CC, Stone and Jeff,and Matt.  The
original concept was CC's, am I right on that?


At 04:52 PM 3/17/97 -0500, you wrote:
>Then who was that guy who looked and sounded exactly like Eddie Vedder 
> singing backup on Hunger Strike.  Must be one of those early clones.
>
>----------
>From:  frbpollock@schoollink.com[SMTP:frbpollock@schoollink.com]
>Sent:  Monday, March 17, 1997 2:34 PM
>To:  somms@MIT.EDU
>Subject:  soundgarden rules
>
>HELLO PEOPLE VEDDER HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH HUNGER STRIKE. CHRIS IS 
>TEMPLE OF
>THE DOGG WITH EXCEPTION OF TWO SONGS. WHICH HE WROTE THE LYRICS FOR. 
>SO
>LEAVE VEDDER OUT OF TEMPLE HE DID NOTHING ON IT.
>
>


------------------------------

From: Mercyhurst Prep Library <mercylib@erie.net>
Subject: Re: soundgarden rules

If I'm recalling my Sgarden/Temple/earlier Seattle history correctly, no
Eddie din't know Andy Wood.  Temple was done around the time EV was joining
Stone and Jeff to form PJ and got included in some aspects of the recording.
Listers, is this correct?

At 03:55 PM 3/17/97 -0800, you wrote:
>>On Mon, 17 Mar 1997, Billy Pollock wrote:
>>
>>> HELLO PEOPLE VEDDER HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH HUNGER STRIKE. CHRIS IS TEMPLE OF
>>> THE DOGG WITH EXCEPTION OF TWO SONGS. WHICH HE WROTE THE LYRICS FOR. SO
>>> LEAVE VEDDER OUT OF TEMPLE HE DID NOTHING ON IT.
>>
>>oh really?
>>do you actually own this album?  you must have never heard it, because if
>>you HAD, you wouldn't make such a blatantly ignorant statement.
>>
>>and i suppose "times of trouble" had nothing to do with eddie, either?

>but I was wondering about this statement today...does anyone know if Vedder
>even 'knew' Andrew Wood?  I read that some members of SG and PJ did...
>
>
>@~^ RoseeMisst ^~@
>
>


------------------------------

From: Toni M Roark <tonerkin@pipeline.com>
Subject: Re: like feathers in sand...


>blind dog wrote:
>	as much as I'd like to agree with you foxx ('t&t' is *way* cooler
>than 'rhinosaur'), I have my doubts that 'rhinosaur' is going to be the
>next single released from _dotu_. in fact, I don't think there will be any
>more singles taken from _dotu_ at all.  
  Justin, don't you think if  radio stations start playing a song(Rock
103.5FM in Chicago has been playing Rhinosaur also) and it generates
interest that a band would and should capitalize on it?  So they spend a day
or two making a new video and release the song as a single I don't think
that is too farfetched. People that are not Soundgarden fanatics have
different reasons for finally going out and buying DOTU. Maybe Rhinosaur
might be the song that will make them do it.  I'm sure Silver Management
and/or A&M watch stuff like that and if there is a genuine "buzz" about a
song they might release it. toni
             Happy Birthday Dana!!!


------------------------------

From: KAISERVRBL@aol.com
Subject: Re: The Kaytrang/Taylor Bootleg Trading Post

In a message dated 97-03-18 08:32:44 EST, you write:

<< Come on, at least Trung is provoking some interesting
 conversation rather than perpetuating topics such as hot dog cars and
 Ben's ass. >>

Taylor, there is absolutely nothing intelligent about what Trang is doing. He
is attacking Geoff for stating a point. Telling Geoff he doesn't support
bootlegs "so he can run to his fucking mommy & tell her he has done a good
deed" is not spawning intelligent conversation. If you want to bitch about
someone attacking people for their points of view talk to Trang not me. All
I'm saying is Geoff doesn't derserve that kind of horse-shit Taylor. RELAX,
christ.

Lance

------------------------------

From: "ANDRI NADZRI" <subpop@hotmail.com>
Subject: Chris-the guitarist


G'Mornin SOMMsters,

i was just wonderin....does SG ussually modify the chords and
arrangement for their songs when they play live?I mean,like someone in the list
mentioned b4, some songs do have layers and layers of guitars on 'em. i
remember reading an interview with Chris and Kim in Guitar World(i forgot what
issue)where chris states that they used to built these thick wall of sound
around their songs to cover up all the mistakes and stuff, but basically
nowadays they're goin for the more stripped down sound. u could really hear the
diff between BMF,SU and
DOTU..would u ppl have that trademark"wall-of-sound" or the more
stripped own SG?

emm..all this stuff bout Chris the great lyricist..anyone mentioning bout Chris
as a great guitarist too?

Catcha l8ter..

"Black and burning sun......."

Andri

- ---------------------------------------------------------
Get Your *Web-Based* Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
- ---------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------

From: KSingh2349@aol.com
Subject: Re: Say hello 2 heaven/andy wood

In a message dated 97-03-18 03:46:45 EST, you write:

<< I'm pretty sure Stargazer is a reference (in both songs) to Andy's
 girlfriend, Xana.
  >>



actually i think i read somewhere that that is what it was meant for....i'm
not sure though...but i read somewhere that chris wrote a song on the temple
cd to sorta console wood's gf
xo

------------------------------

From: KSingh2349@aol.com
Subject: Re: 4th of July live at Reading 95

In a message dated 97-03-18 04:54:40 EST, you write:

<< He answered, "Oh, that's tough.  4th Of July is probably the one I'm
 particularly proud of, because it always felt like it was entirely my own.
  
 If a song means something to you and a whole bunch of people respond to
 it, then it sort of changes your idea about it.  And if I think a song's  
 really great and other people think it's shit, then I almost start liking 
 it more because I feel like I knew something they didn't."
  >>



that's funny considering the story behind the creation of the song eh?.....i
have the little booklet of the making of the superunknown and for the little
description for 4th of july the original version that cornell wrote came
forth one day after he got a bit high and he was walking and kept thinking
someone was following him....but then when he was "sober" he looked at it and
didnt like it and completely revamped the whole thing.....so my fav song ever
might not have been
xo

------------------------------

From: KSingh2349@aol.com
Subject: Re: soundgarden rules

In a message dated 97-03-18 07:47:04 EST, you write:

<< If I'm recalling my Sgarden/Temple/earlier Seattle history correctly, no
 Eddie din't know Andy Wood.  Temple was done around the time EV was joining
 Stone and Jeff to form PJ and got included in some aspects of the recording.
 Listers, is this correct?
  >>



hadn't pj already pout out ten when the temple project was put
together...from what i know...the story goes that one or two memebers of pj
(as well as matt cameron - but dont quote me on that one) were part of a band
with wood before....and that wood was once cornell's roommate...other than
that....there were no real ties with wood to anyone else....esp ev
xo




------------------------------

From: KSingh2349@aol.com
Subject: Re: soundgarden rules

In a message dated 97-03-18 08:35:41 EST, you write:

<< I'm going to hazard a guess, after re-reading the original message that
the
 writer meant that EV didn't do any of the WRITING for Temple, just some
 patched in vocals.  IMHO Temple was CC, Stone and Jeff,and Matt.  The
 original concept was CC's, am I right on that?
  >>



not too sure about the concept being cc's alone...but toher thatn
that....exactly right
xo

------------------------------

From: KSingh2349@aol.com
Subject: Re: comin' up on your right...

In a message dated 97-03-18 08:42:29 EST, you write:

<< Again, I will ask if anyone has heard them play 'limo wreck' live.  This
 is probably one of my *favorite* SG songs.  I've been working on trying
 to play it and sing for about a year now.  I don't see how anyone can
 keep their vocals that consistantly clear while under the demands it
 takes to sing that song.  My vocals start to crack up near the second
 verse's 'harvest the gold' and I have to stop and take a drink. ;)
  >>



is there any question that chris is a genius?....both in his writing and his
vocals?...i personally think he's amazing.....true mind you that i am a bit
infatuated with him...but my cousins have been into sg for as long as i can
remember....and they're the ones who got me into them to begin with...so i've
been "following" sg since i was about 13/14....for aprx 5-6 years....it wasnt
until i was completely into cornell's depth that i actually got to see
him....believe it or not...the first time i ever saw cornell was in the
hunger strike video...and thus begins a teenage girl's infatuation with a
superb speciman of man....other than that though....talking as a fan and
someone who is genuinely in it for the music/lyrics more than anything.....no
one (sorry taylor) can even come close to what chris does.....he's got
amazing vocals....and i've noticed that from their earlier albums to
dotu....he's progressed so much as an artist...he has a much wider range with
his vocals now...as well as having raises his writing to a magnificent art
form....try as hard as we may.....we will never be able to touch cornell
xo

------------------------------

From: Lynne Lowe <lynnel@yardi.com>
Subject: Re: I have to speak up in favor of....

I agree with Taylor and Deb.  We must speak our minds even if it isn't the
popular voice.  I don't always agree with what I read on this list but I
have to remember that everyone has their own opinions.  I get to see a
different point of view.  We can all learn from one another...  

Peace,

Lynne


------------------------------

From: Mercyhurst Prep Library <mercylib@erie.net>
Subject: Re: soundgarden rules

Yeah, wasn't Temple _right_ after Ten came out?  I can recall how annoyed my
friend Lin was that Hunger Strike was getting so much airplay it seemed b/c
EV sang on it, and so it was like they were trying to ride on PJ's coattails
INSTEAD of going on the strength of CC's vocals and the project itself.
Yes, Stone and Jeff were in Mother Love Bone w/ Andy, and yes, Andy was CC's
roomie for a while, which is one reason Andy's death hit Chris so hard.  And
I'd have to say those were pretty strong ties!  The Seattle music scene is
very much "incestuous" w/ everyone knowing everyone else and being friends.
EV didn't know Andy, so I remain clueless to this day why he was brought in
on the project unless it WAS to cash in on PJ's early success.  What's
anyone's take on that?
later....deb

At 10:22 AM 3/18/97 -0500, you wrote:


>hadn't pj already pout out ten when the temple project was put
>together...from what i know...the story goes that one or two memebers of pj
>(as well as matt cameron - but dont quote me on that one) were part of a band
>with wood before....and that wood was once cornell's roommate...other than
>that....there were no real ties with wood to anyone else....esp ev
>xo
>
>
>


------------------------------

From: Taylor Holmes <holmest@netdepot.com>
Subject: Re: The Kaytrang Bootleg Trading Post

KAISERVRBL@aol.com wrote:
> 
> <<  But do you really think that
>  Chris, when counting his millions or speeding in his Porshe, really cares
>  whether or not I buy FDR? Give me a fucking break. I am the one buying
>  his albums, etc. The only reason you adhere to this principle of not
>  getting boots Geoff is so you can walk into the kitchen and tell Mommy
>  that you did something good today.  >>
> 
> Seth,
> 
> You kicked him off once. Why do you keep letting him back?
> 
> Geoff, ignore him he's an ass.
> 
> Lance

What are we going to kick off everyone who does'nt share the same views
as us?  Come on, at least Trung is provoking some interesting
conversation rather than perpetuating topics such as hot dog cars and
Ben's ass.  For christ sake, at least we've got someone who will stand
up and speak their opinion like an individual, instead of molding their
views to please popular list philosophy.  We're in need for some good
fucking intelligent debates... why can't you folks argue you're point
without getting pissed off or attacking people as you make your point?
Geez...

Later, Taylor

- -- 
D. Taylor Holmes
Senior Quality Assurance Analyst, Automated Test Coordinator
Datastream Systems Software, Inc.
home: holmest@netdepot.com
work: holmest@dstm.com

------------------------------

From: Mercyhurst Prep Library <mercylib@erie.net>
Subject: I have to speak up in favor of....

I also have to speak up for Trung.  There's absolutely NO REASON why people
on this list can't voice their own opinions!  How boring it would be if we
all had the exact same thoughts, views and opinions!  Then there'd be no
reason to even have this list.  As far as I can tell, the USA is still a
free country and we still have freedom of speech.  There's a growing
attitude on this list that I find disturbing--We can't have opinions that
are contrary to either certain people's opinions or that may be different
from a concensus of people on the list.  Why?  I have to agree with Taylor
that at least Trung is giving us some interesting thoughts on things other
than why Chris and Susan were at the Grammys and who could beat who in a
fight and what kind of car Chris drives.

Along those lines, I also add my vote to Trung's about the RS article on EV.
What IF it was true, that EV IS a controlling, scheming person?  Everyone
who's pissed off about that article has to remember EV had the chance to
give an interview and turned it down.  So being reputed journalists, they
set out to find out what kind of person he is, and maybe give some insight
as to why he turned them down and into some of the ills of PJ.  I don't like
EV, I've heard too much about how he's running PJ (which imho is not his
band but jeff and stone's) and maybe it's time PJ fans see him as he really is.

So to further agree w/ Taylor...why is it the list has a tendency to jump
all over people who voice an opposing view?  What's wrong w/ having some
debates and HEARING OUT EACH OTHER before names are called and flames are
thrown????  Frankly I find some of these debates that are slightly off
Sgarden to be very thought provoking, sometimes better than some of the
Sgarden chatter!

later.....deb


>What are we going to kick off everyone who does'nt share the same views
>as us?  Come on, at least Trung is provoking some interesting
>conversation rather than perpetuating topics such as hot dog cars and
>Ben's ass.  For christ sake, at least we've got someone who will stand
>up and speak their opinion like an individual, instead of molding their
>views to please popular list philosophy.  We're in need for some good
>fucking intelligent debates... why can't you folks argue you're point
>without getting pissed off or attacking people as you make your point?
>Geez...
>
>Later, Taylor
>
>-- 
>D. Taylor Holmes
>Senior Quality Assurance Analyst, Automated Test Coordinator
>Datastream Systems Software, Inc.
>home: holmest@netdepot.com
>work: holmest@dstm.com
>


------------------------------

Subject: Re: soundgarden rules
From: jsimpson@mail03.mitre.org (Jamesetta Simpson)

>EV didn't know Andy, so I remain clueless to this day why he was brought
in
>on the project unless it WAS to cash in on PJ's early success.  What's
>anyone's take on that?
>later....deb

As you said Deb the Seattle music crowd is very tight - one may figure that
when EV and Pearl Jam had started to take off that Chris and Eddie had
already become friends.  When Chris was putting the album together I'm sure
he just wanted to get the right sounds from the right people on it.  My
guess would be he just knew his and Eddie voice would be the correct sound
for Hunger Strike.  This is one CD that I never felt Chris and the other
who played on it were looking for any success or acclamation.  I have
always felt it was truly a labor of love and loss.  Surprisingly it has
always been my feeling that ToTD is some of Chris's best work..  The music
for ToTD is completely emotional and done with adoration for a loss
friend..  But then that is just IMHO...   Now as far as the video for
Hunger Strike goes now there I would say maybe someone at the management
level pushed for this song because of Pearl Jams fame...

Jamie
(Village Idiot/SOMMs Mom)


------------------------------

From: Taylor Holmes <holmest@netdepot.com>
Subject: Re: comin' up on your right...

blind dog wrote:
> 
>         just out of interest, are there many soundgarden songs (other than
> b-sides) that *haven't* been performed live at some time?  

Again, I will ask if anyone has heard them play 'limo wreck' live.  This
is probably one of my *favorite* SG songs.  I've been working on trying
to play it and sing for about a year now.  I don't see how anyone can
keep their vocals that consistantly clear while under the demands it
takes to sing that song.  My vocals start to crack up near the second
verse's 'harvest the gold' and I have to stop and take a drink. ;)

Later, Taylor
- -- 
D. Taylor Holmes
Senior Quality Assurance Analyst, Automated Test Coordinator
Datastream Systems Software, Inc.
home: holmest@netdepot.com
work: holmest@dstm.com

------------------------------

From: KSingh2349@aol.com
Subject: Re: soundgarden rules

In a message dated 97-03-18 11:19:28 EST, you write:

<< Yeah, wasn't Temple _right_ after Ten came out?  I can recall how annoyed
my
 friend Lin was that Hunger Strike was getting so much airplay it seemed b/c
 EV sang on it, and so it was like they were trying to ride on PJ's coattails
 INSTEAD of going on the strength of CC's vocals and the project itself.
 Yes, Stone and Jeff were in Mother Love Bone w/ Andy, and yes, Andy was CC's
 roomie for a while, which is one reason Andy's death hit Chris so hard.  And
 I'd have to say those were pretty strong ties!  The Seattle music scene is
 very much "incestuous" w/ everyone knowing everyone else and being friends.
 EV didn't know Andy, so I remain clueless to this day why he was brought in
 on the project unless it WAS to cash in on PJ's early success.  What's
 anyone's take on that? >>


ok...one thing i'm not very proud to admit being a huge soundgarden
fan....see...the first time (like i mentioned before) i ever saw chris was in
the hunger strike video..and i would've passed by it had i not cought a
glimpse of ev....i knew who ev was cuz when they came out with ten i got
really into it...loved the songs...and saw a few videos and stuff...so i knew
who he was...cornell on the other hand i didnt know...so i watched the
video...thought the guy singing along side vedder (oooh how i shudder at that
now.....it's soooo wrong..it's ev singing alongside cc..not the way i
originally thought it)...was gorgeous....and an amazing singer....and thought
i knew him from somewhere...it wasnt until later when i was looking at the
cover of my bmf cd that i saw those gorgeous locks of cc's and realized
duh...that was cornell.....but as we were saying....i think pretty much with
the huge hype and response behind ten that that wasprobably the main reason
why ev was brought into it
xo

------------------------------

From: Taylor Holmes <holmest@netdepot.com>
Subject: Re: ev knowing aw

Rosario Fusca wrote:
> 
> i heard that eddie didnt know him at all, he got a tape given to him by
> jack irons that had some music on it. eddie decided he liked the music
> so he went to seattle to form pj and worked on totd as a sot of side
> project. thats just what i heard though. ruth


This belongs on the Pearl Jam list.  

Later, Taylor

- -I swear I'm not an apple

- -- 
D. Taylor Holmes
Senior Quality Assurance Analyst, Automated Test Coordinator
Datastream Systems Software, Inc.
home: holmest@netdepot.com
work: holmest@dstm.com

------------------------------

From: Rebekah Henderson <rebemat@usit.net>
Subject: Club Lingerie

I'm with Mind Riot.  I'd love to have a copy of the Club Lingerie boot too.
:)  There's no way I can reproduce video boots (at least not until I can get
my hands on another VCR. whenever that will be), but I can reproduce audio
and I'm on the newbie list, so somebody please help a poor newbie out! :)  

May Soundgarden be with you.

Rebekah


------------------------------

From: "Andrew Dunn" <addunn@aa.net>
Subject: Temple/Andrew/Matt/Real PJ History

Little bit of PJ history.  (because PJ's start is actually a strange part
of Soundgarden's history)

> hadn't pj already pout out ten when the temple project was put
> together...from what i know...the story goes that one or two memebers of
pj
> (as well as matt cameron - but dont quote me on that one) were part of a
band
> with wood before....and that wood was once cornell's roommate...other
than
> that....there were no real ties with wood to anyone else....esp ev
> xo

In <i>Loser</i> it states that Pearl Jam got together and after the first
week or rehersal they played at the Off Ramp.  The first show was taped
(10/22/90) So I would suspect that Jack gave Eddie the tape sometime in
September or early October. If Eddie wanted to be Andrew's friend then he
would have been too late.  I would be interested to see who is actually on
that tape of the first show (Dave or Matt).  But the way I understood it is
Stone, Jeff and Mike borrowed Matt to record the demo and that by the time
it had circulated down to Eddie, Dave Krusen had stepped in.    

This doesn't mean that Eddie hadn't seen MLB in concert before, been a fan
before, nothing.  I'm pretty certain Eddie was well aware of the scene,
being that seems to be a very long term fan of bands like the Fastbacks. 
But no, Andy did not know Eddie personally from what anybody printed. 
Obviously sitting around the fire and hearing stories about Andrew with
Cornell, Ament, and Gossard probably brought him closer to the 'legend' of
Andrew Wood than most fans get, and with the sudden success of Ten probably
started to understand the problems of what Andrew was going through. 
Obviously Eddie grasps and appreciates the fact that he was in the right
place at the right time.

Cornell has said in multiple interviews that he was just kinda there
recording with Temple and since he has a good voice they let him come in. 
Unfortnately I think people ask Chris about Temple of the Dog (and the
connection to Pearl Jam) so much I'm beginning to think he wished he never
did it by the tone in the last couple articles I've seen  =).  Every time I
hear a PJ question during a Soundgarden article I cringe.

But what's little known is the truth in the rumor than Matt Cameron helped
put together the demo tape which lurred Eddie to Seattle or the demo tapes
which sprung up during the first week or two.  

Loser states that he was there, but which tape?  It's kind of interesting
though, because I've heard the tape that's the most likely one and I have
to say that it's not too good.  It's interesting, but it's pretty weird. 
Matt is the best drummer, but would have never fit into Pearl Jam anyways.

- -Andrew

------------------------------

From: Taylor Holmes <holmest@netdepot.com>
Subject: Re: comin' up on your right...

Taylor Holmes wrote:

> Again, I will ask if anyone has heard them play 'limo wreck' live.  This
> is probably one of my *favorite* SG songs.  I've been working on trying
> to play it and sing for about a year now.  I don't see how anyone can
> keep their vocals that consistantly clear while under the demands it
> takes to sing that song.  My vocals start to crack up near the second
> verse's 'harvest the gold' and I have to stop and take a drink. ;)
> 
> Later, Taylor

Umm... Taylor, why don't you take advantage of a great informational web
site and educate yourself before you post, you moron... 

PUSH 03/23/94
Label: Metal Crash
Venue: Sentrum Scene in Oslo, Norway
Time: 104:45 Sound: B
Disc 2:
10. Limo Wreck

Later, Taylor

- -You've never really lived until you've flamed yourself.


- -- 
D. Taylor Holmes
Senior Quality Assurance Analyst, Automated Test Coordinator
Datastream Systems Software, Inc.
home: holmest@netdepot.com
work: holmest@dstm.com

------------------------------

From: caryn rose <clr@nwlink.com>
Subject: Re: The Kaytrang Bootleg Trading Post

On Tue, 18 Mar 1997, Taylor Holmes wrote:

> KAISERVRBL@aol.com wrote:
> > 
> > <<  But do you really think that
> >  Chris, when counting his millions or speeding in his Porshe, really cares
> >  whether or not I buy FDR? Give me a fucking break. I am the one buying
> >  his albums, etc. The only reason you adhere to this principle of not
> >  getting boots Geoff is so you can walk into the kitchen and tell Mommy
> >  that you did something good today.  >>
> > 
> > Seth,
> > 
> > You kicked him off once. Why do you keep letting him back?
> > 
> > Geoff, ignore him he's an ass.
> > 
> > Lance
> 
> What are we going to kick off everyone who does'nt share the same views
> as us?  Come on, at least Trung is provoking some interesting
> conversation rather than perpetuating topics such as hot dog cars and
> Ben's ass.

hot dog cars was an attempt to stop the stupid, mindless "*i* know what
kind of car chris drives!" "no, *I* know what kind of car chris drives!"
"no, you're ALL wrong, only *I* know what kind of car chris drives!"
posts, and to interject a little humor into the list, which has been sadly
lacking.

>  For christ sake, at least we've got someone who will stand
> up and speak their opinion like an individual, instead of molding their
> views to please popular list philosophy.

so far, ever time mr. trang has posted, it's been to rile people up.
that's why he got kicked the first time.  the ev vs. rs post was
pointless.

>  We're in need for some good
> fucking intelligent debates... why can't you folks argue you're point
> without getting pissed off or attacking people as you make your point?
> Geez...

...and if i may point out, geoff did that; but mr. trang responded by
attacking him, not the other way around.

- --caryn


------------------------------

From: Joe Cennamo <jcennamo@freenet.columbus.oh.us>
Subject: Re: Rhinosaur

On Tue, 18 Mar 1997, Foxx Watkins wrote:

>           hey guys I'm new on the list but so far i'm am enjoying it a lot.
> I wanted of comment on soundgarden's release of Rhinosaur.  My radio station
> that i listen to has been playing it a month now.  It's a great song
> (warning what I'm about to say may be considered blasphhemy by some
> sommsters) but i believe that tighter and tighter could have did for DOTU
> what my wave did for superunknown. 

I think that tighter and tighter will be released as a single eventually.
Superunknown had 5 singles and DOTUS could easy have that if not more.. I
was at concert Friday and the dj's played tighter and tighter between
bands. Normally they only play singles, so it's robably been planned for
release.



joec






------------------------------

From: caryn rose <clr@nwlink.com>
Subject: Re: soundgarden rules

On Tue, 18 Mar 1997, Mercyhurst Prep Library wrote:

> Yeah, wasn't Temple _right_ after Ten came out?  I can recall how annoyed my
> friend Lin was that Hunger Strike was getting so much airplay it seemed b/c
> EV sang on it, and so it was like they were trying to ride on PJ's coattails
> INSTEAD of going on the strength of CC's vocals and the project itself.
> Yes, Stone and Jeff were in Mother Love Bone w/ Andy, and yes, Andy was CC's
> roomie for a while, which is one reason Andy's death hit Chris so hard.  And
> I'd have to say those were pretty strong ties!  The Seattle music scene is
> very much "incestuous" w/ everyone knowing everyone else and being friends.
> EV didn't know Andy, so I remain clueless to this day why he was brought in
> on the project unless it WAS to cash in on PJ's early success.  What's
> anyone's take on that?
> later....deb

eddie had come up to seattle and was hanging around, and thus was INVITED
by the temple members to participate in the recording. remember, totd was
a one off created in tribute to a dead friend; it was never meant to be a
commercial success and it wasn't when it was first released.  there wasn't
even a video.

then, sg and pj began to skyrocket in popularity and A&M (not totd, not
pj, not vedder, jesus, you people have such prejudices) decided to
re-release and promote totd in order to capitalize on the success of both
of those bands.  again:  totd was already recorded and released.  eddie
wasn't brought in by anyone because why they were recording it he was
still no one, just this surfer dude from san diego who had just joined
this new band, mookie blaylock.  no one in the band made the decision to
do this; the record company did. (and yes, the record company can choose
to do whatever it wants to to promote an album; they cannot force the
artists to participate, but they can decide to start pushing something
again)

remember, temple was chris and stone and jeff for the most part; do you
think anyone could have made them include vedder if they didn't want to?  
if eddie was as talentless as some of you make him out to be, why would
they invite him to participate?  again, he was NO ONE at the time... pearl
jam were no one at the time... 

please, pearl jam bashing to the usual address.  let's keep it off here.

- --caryn


------------------------------

From: caryn rose <clr@nwlink.com>
Subject: Re: Temple/Andrew/Matt/Real PJ History


On Tue, 18 Mar 1997, Andrew Dunn wrote:

> Little bit of PJ history.  (because PJ's start is actually a strange part
> of Soundgarden's history)

</me bows to the pj historian which is andrew dunn>

> Cornell has said in multiple interviews that he was just kinda there
> recording with Temple and since he has a good voice they let him come in. 
> Unfortnately I think people ask Chris about Temple of the Dog (and the
> connection to Pearl Jam) so much I'm beginning to think he wished he never
> did it by the tone in the last couple articles I've seen  =).  Every time I
> hear a PJ question during a Soundgarden article I cringe.

...and every time i see pj being discussed on this list, i cringe, for
that reason.

> But what's little known is the truth in the rumor than Matt Cameron helped
> put together the demo tape which lurred Eddie to Seattle or the demo tapes
> which sprung up during the first week or two.  
> 
> Loser states that he was there, but which tape?  It's kind of interesting
> though, because I've heard the tape that's the most likely one and I have
> to say that it's not too good.  It's interesting, but it's pretty weird. 
> Matt is the best drummer, but would have never fit into Pearl Jam anyways.

well, we know for sure he was on it, because he told me and chris when we
gave him a copy of the video of the ONLY full totd performance (without
eddie, by the way -- he was moving his stuff up to seattle at the time)
when we met him at the hater show, he confirmed that not only was he the
drummer on the demos, but that stone had never given him a copy.  nd, it
is so obvious (to me anyway) that that is matt cameron on the mammasan
tapes -- and he did confirm that he was on the tape that they *sent* to
eddie, and that he was on one of the 'ten' demos (that explains why there
are TWO....)

if any of you want more chronology, you can look at five horizons' concert
chronology at http://www1.ixa.net/horizons/tour/cc/ -- but this is
straying into pearl jam discussion territory and thus has no place on this
list (especially since once again it's degenerating into 'this band sucks,
soundgarden are SO much better', and people who know NOTHING about the
internal workings of pearl jam pontificating in the air [no, i don't
either, but you don't see me making grandiose statements about eddie
vedder being an asshole, now do you])

- --caryn


------------------------------

From: Andrea <andrea@avantasoft.com>
Subject: Re: stole a thousand beggar's chains..

From: Vince Varkey <varkey@utdallas.edu>
Subject: stole a thousand beggar's chains..

I got this cool SG video boot the other day. It was from their
Superunknown 
tour of 1994. It was really neat to see them play songs that they don't 
play now, like Mailman, Head Down, and Like Suicide. It was also cool to
see 
Chris be able to hit every note, like it was nothing, which was so
unlike many 
of the DOTU shows. I envy anyone who went to see them in 1994. So my 
question is this:

Do you all think that SG played better on their Superunknown tour or
their 
Down on the Upside 1996 tour? 

Not an easy question but I would love to see what you all think. How
*do* 
they compare to tours they have had in the past?

- - -vince


Vince,

First of all, where did you get the boot? I'd love a copy. 

As far as which tour they played better on, I think it's hard to say.
The venue they played at in LA for the Superunknown tour SUCKED!!! It
was actually a boxing ring! The sound was awful, Ben was pissed off the
whole show, my seats weren't that great, etc. So although I was happy as
hell to see them I wouldn't call it a great show. On the other hand,
when I saw them last December, the venue was great with good sound, my
seats were cool, Ben was behaving and they all seemed to be having a
pretty good time. Chris' voice was obviously not as strong as it was in
'94 and they played more of my favorite songs then as well, but I'd have
to say that the '96 show was the better one for me.

So I guess what I'm getting at is that there are so many factors that go
into whether or not an person thinks they played better on one tour or
another. Maybe those that went to a few shows on each tour would be
better equipped to answer that question than I.

- --andrea

------------------------------

From: KSingh2349@aol.com
Subject: Re: I have to speak up in favor of....

In a message dated 97-03-18 12:00:34 EST, you write:

<< So to further agree w/ Taylor...why is it the list has a tendency to jump
 all over people who voice an opposing view?  What's wrong w/ having some
 debates and HEARING OUT EACH OTHER before names are called and flames are
 thrown????  Frankly I find some of these debates that are slightly off
 Sgarden to be very thought provoking, sometimes better than some of the
 Sgarden chatter!
  >>



to add to that...there's only so much that can be said about sg without going
a bit beyond the 5 (counting susan) members of the band.....there's other
factors influencing them and the music than just the world that revolves
around them...true we may all be avid sg fans...but come on...can we not
expand our horizons just a tad bit?
xo

------------------------------

From: Rita Bonofiglio <yu166423@YorkU.CA>
Subject: Re: soundgarden rules

On Tue, 18 Mar 1997 KSingh2349@aol.com wrote:

> Date: Tue, 18 Mar 1997 10:25:05 -0500 (EST)
> From: KSingh2349@aol.com
> To: somms@MIT.EDU
> Subject: Re: soundgarden rules
> 
> In a message dated 97-03-18 08:35:41 EST, you write:
> 
> << I'm going to hazard a guess, after re-reading the original message that
> the
>  writer meant that EV didn't do any of the WRITING for Temple, just some
>  patched in vocals.  IMHO Temple was CC, Stone and Jeff,and Matt.  The
>  original concept was CC's, am I right on that?
>   >>
> 
> 
> 
> not too sure about the concept being cc's alone...but toher thatn
> that....exactly right
> xo
> 


straight from jeff ament's mouth "chris wrote two amazing songs about andy
(say hello to heaven and reach down) and asked stone and jeff and matt 2
record them"...so i guess that means it was chris' original idea

- -----rita b.


------------------------------

From: KSingh2349@aol.com
Subject: Re: Temple/Andrew/Matt/Real PJ History

In a message dated 97-03-18 12:07:03 EST, you write:

<<  (Dave or Matt).  But the way I understood it is
 Stone, Jeff and Mike borrowed Matt to record the demo and that by the time
 it had circulated down to Eddie, Dave Krusen had stepped in. >>


so then i was right?..matt was a one point (albeit veryvery shortlived) some
part of the whole pj thing?



 <<Every time I
hear a PJ question during a Soundgarden article I cringe.>>


i honestly wish that they'd (the media) start to differentiate between the
seattle bands already...yeah they come from the same city....yeah they all
"came out" at relatively the same time....but i wish they'd just get over
that already and see each band as a seperate entity




<<But what's little known is the truth in the rumor than Matt Cameron helped
put together the demo tape which lurred Eddie to Seattle or the demo tapes
which sprung up during the first week or two.  >>

ok....i knew i heard it somewhere and it was right...weeeeeee




<<Loser states that he was there, but which tape?  It's kind of interesting
though, because I've heard the tape that's the most likely one and I have
to say that it's not too good.  It's interesting, but it's pretty weird. 
Matt is the best drummer, but would have never fit into Pearl Jam anyways.>>


it's the chemistry of all four of them that makes them so good....put matt
and ben and kim and chris all in seperate bands.....and mind you...due to
their success now they may do well at first....but in the long run they will
probably end up failing....cuz well...they work great together....but apart
they're not as good as the whole...what's the saying?...united we stand
devided we fall?
xo

------------------------------

From: KSingh2349@aol.com
Subject: Re: soundgarden rules

In a message dated 97-03-18 12:17:08 EST, you write:

<< remember, temple was chris and stone and jeff for the most part; do you
 think anyone could have made them include vedder if they didn't want to?  
 if eddie was as talentless as some of you make him out to be, why would
 they invite him to participate?  again, he was NO ONE at the time... pearl
 jam were no one at the time... 
  >>


i dont think anyone said that ev is/was talentless...on the contrary..i
believe he's great.....as for the rest of the message....let's just face
it...all of us out here in soundgardenland know bits and pieces of the
different stories....so we post what we think is right...or atleast what
we've been told (like my post about 4th of july being layerd and thus them
not being able to sing it....whereas i'm wrong...bhs for instance was layered
among many others and yet it sounds great live...so i backed down from that
stance...cuz i was told the right thing).....but we just share what (little)
we know.....and if someone else has better info....that disproves the first
person...then let's not stick it to them.....just say your bit...but dont
bash the other person
xo

------------------------------

From: KSingh2349@aol.com
Subject: just a q?

In a message dated 97-03-18 12:31:06 EST, you write:

<<  Andrew Dunn >>



i'm sorry guys...this a bit (waaaaaaaaaaaaaay) off....but why does that name
seem so incredibly familiar to me.....
xo

------------------------------

From: KSingh2349@aol.com
Subject: re: soundgarden rule

In a message dated 97-03-18 13:07:46 EST, you write:

<< straight from jeff ament's mouth "chris wrote two amazing songs about andy
 (say hello to heaven and reach down) and asked stone and jeff and matt 2
 record them"...so i guess that means it was chris' original idea >>


again..i say thanks for the info..i just posted what i knew to be true...but
even still..chris started off by writing two songs about a freind of
his....but who's to say that the totd collaboration wasnt a collective
idea?......he may have sparked the idea...but maybe the original idea came
from ament or gossard himself?....just my two cents
xo

------------------------------

From: "Cornholio" <DGEORGECOS@lib.wci.edu.on.ca>
Subject:       Re: Burden in my Hand UK Import

> Date sent:      Fri, 14 Mar 1997 21:42:05 -0600
> From:           Kathie and David <oponfam@cnsnet.com>
> Send reply to:  oponfam@cnsnet.com
> To:             Soundgarden Mailing List <somms@MIT.EDU>
> Subject:        Burden in my Hand UK Import

> Hi again. I just got a wonderful surprise and I wanted to share. I
> discovered the Burden in my Hand single on my pillow after I put the
> kids to bed tonight. It was a surprise from my hubby. Its been a long
> time since I got an Import and I'm thrilled! I wanted to ask a question
> about the CD though. It has a sticker on the front that says Limited
> Edition Collectors Slip Box with Free Poster. I can't find a number on
> it or any info (I could just not be looking in the right place). I
> looked on the web page, but I don't know where this one fits in. It
> doesn't say anything about being a "club promo", but it does say its a
> limited edition. Does anyone know how limited it is? Thanks. It is in a
> box, with a poster and says Part 2 of a 2 CD set. 
> 
> Kathie
> 

Yeah, I got that too..

It's pretty cool...it has a CC interview with the single. But there's 
always a chance on the CD there is a serial number. I gotta check 
when I get home though. I got the poster up in my room...along with 
my other crappy SG DOTU poster. I can't seem to find any SG posters 
in any Southern Ontario stores....and it kinda sucks when all these 
low lame zines got small SG posters...damn Live wire...... 

Corny





Fish heads, Fish heads,
Roly Poly Fish heads,
Fish heads. Fish heads,
Eat them up, YUM!
- -Barnes & Barnes

"I love ya baby!"--665 by Soundgarden (reversed)



------------------------------

From: Slave4cc@aol.com
Subject: what does it mean?

Hello all,

I have always wondered what this means exactly. "You make me hate I make
music".  I see on BMF it was "You make me sick I make music" or "In one ear
out your mother" (that one's ok).  Basically, it could be anything they want
it to be called, this trademark or whatever you call it.  So, why do you
spose he chose to call it the first one I mentioned? Who makes him hate he
hates music?  Me? You? Us? Who?

I think fame probably makes him hate he makes music.  I would hate fame too.

Come on, anyone.  Give me some feedback!
If youve already covered this before last year or something, sorry.

Thanks,

Carol 


------------------------------

From: mshaw@lib.occ.cccd.edu (RoseeMisst)
Subject: Re: ev knowing aw

>Rosario Fusca wrote:
>>
>> i heard that eddie didnt know him at all, he got a tape given to him by
>> jack irons that had some music on it. eddie decided he liked the music
>> so he went to seattle to form pj and worked on totd as a sot of side
>> project. thats just what i heard though. ruth
>
>
>This belongs on the Pearl Jam list.
>
>Later, Taylor
>
>-I swear I'm not an apple
>

Actually, it's a TOTD response--which is related to Chris Cornell question!



@~^ RoseeMisst ^~@



------------------------------

From: Slave4cc@aol.com
Subject: correction of my previous post fu*k up, sorry =)

>>Who makes him hate he hates music? Me? You? Us? Who?<<

that is: Who makes him hate he MAKES music!

Dam I screwed that up! You knew what I meant anyhow, right?

Carol =)

------------------------------

From: caryn rose <clr@nwlink.com>
Subject: Re: just a q?


On Tue, 18 Mar 1997 KSingh2349@aol.com wrote:

> In a message dated 97-03-18 12:31:06 EST, you write:
> 
> <<  Andrew Dunn >>
> 
> 
> i'm sorry guys...this a bit (waaaaaaaaaaaaaay) off....but why does that name
> seem so incredibly familiar to me.....

not off at all; in fact, dead *on*.  andy dunn is one of the best
knowledge sources out there regarding the history of pearl jam -- ask any
pj fan on the net.

- --caryn


------------------------------

From: caryn rose <clr@nwlink.com>
Subject: re: soundgarden rule


On Tue, 18 Mar 1997 KSingh2349@aol.com wrote:

> In a message dated 97-03-18 13:07:46 EST, you write:
> 
> << straight from jeff ament's mouth "chris wrote two amazing songs about andy
>  (say hello to heaven and reach down) and asked stone and jeff and matt 2
>  record them"...so i guess that means it was chris' original idea >>
> 
> 
> again..i say thanks for the info..i just posted what i knew to be true...but
> even still..chris started off by writing two songs about a freind of
> his....but who's to say that the totd collaboration wasnt a collective
> idea?......he may have sparked the idea...but maybe the original idea came
> from ament or gossard himself?....just my two cents

i personally believe it was chris' idea.  this is just my impression,
based on what i have heard over the years... that chris took it
particularly hard, being that andy wood was a former roommate of his.
that doesn't mean that stone and jeff didn't take the loss of their
bandmate hard.. but from what i understand, chris chose to deal with his
grief by writing, and when he had a bunch of songs he turned to stone and
jeff to ask them they wanted to do something with him... which turned into
totd... there was not yet a formal pj or mookie yet, which is why they
turned to matt as the drummer (then again, isn't the quote that every band
in seattle wanted matt cameron as their drummer? ;-) )

of course, i don't really know... none of us can really know, unless we
engaged the relevant parties in a lengthy discussion... you can't even
take interviews as gospel because the guys are human, after all, and don't
have perfect memories....

- --caryn


------------------------------

From: caryn rose <clr@nwlink.com>
Subject: Re: 4th of July live at Reading 95

first of all, vikki, *thank you* for this AMAZING post! ;->

On Tue, 18 Mar 1997, V. Anselmo wrote:

> 4th of July was played to perfection at the Reading Festival 95.  Since
> the guys hadn't touched this song throughout their 94 tour, I was stunned  
> and euphoric to hear it live.  The festival takes place in August.  Since 
> I'm originally from New York, August conjures a feeling of stagnance and
> perspiration.  But August at the Reading Festival provided an unusually
> cold and windy night, even by England standards.  The show began as the
> sun was setting.  An hour later, the beauty that is the slow building  
> magnitude of '4th of July' was floating on the wind over the large field 
> during the kind of cold summer night I'd always envisioned when listening 
> to the song on my headset.  It's a difficult song to offer to a large,
> unfamiliar crowd.

i'd even argue that it's a difficult song to offer live, period.  not
because of the vocals, or any studio trickery or what have you -- just
because of the depth and the feeling.  hard to duplicate that, hard to
even TRY to duplicate that...

>  (/me waves to those who experienced the song at the
> Showbox to contrast the moment for us)

heh... all i remember is total, utter SHOCK... not that i have setlists
memorized, and we don't have a sg concert chronology (yet! ;-> /me waves
at the relevant party... i'm workin' on it, okay? :->), but i knew that
'4th of july' was not exactly in the sg top ten of live songs... and also
just instinctively knew, if you will, that this song is not a live one,
for the reasons i mentioned above...

<.  SG have only playing the song 
> twice, to my knowledge -- once in a large field and then in a small club
> ....and never since.  Kerrang recent asked Chris which song he's most proud 
> of.  He answered, "Oh, that's tough.  4th Of July is probably the one I'm
> particularly proud of, because it always felt like it was entirely my own.   
> If a song means something to you and a whole bunch of people respond to
> it, then it sort of changes your idea about it.  And if I think a song's  
> really great and other people think it's shit, then I almost start liking 
> it more because I feel like I knew something they didn't."

with that in mind, i wonder what chris *feels* when he performs it?
perhaps that is another factor that dissuades them from trying to perform
it often.  

- --caryn


------------------------------

From: Jaime Gonzalez <jgg@pilot.msu.edu>
Subject: Re: what does it mean?

Carol,I think it means that the Music Industry makes him sick that he 
makes music.I am generalizing of course.It is full of business types
who are really only interested in  making money and don't give a rats ass
about art or music or self expression.
Certain aspects of fame could also be rather undesirable,such as losing
your privacy,the scrutiny of everything you do by the media and the public.
Anyways,"You make me sick I make music" is the name of his publishing co.
and it is with this mechanism that his royalties are paid to him any time
one of his songs on which he has music and,or lyrics credits. is played
on the radio,soundtrack,album,or for the sale of sheet music,performance
royalties,too.It get pretty complicated so I am not going there now.
At 01:51 PM 3/18/97 -0500, you wrote:
>I see on BMF it was "You make me sick I make music" or "In one ear
>out your mother" (that one's ok).  
> whatever you call it.So, why do you
>spose he chose to call it the first one I mentioned? Who makes him Sick he
>hates music?  Me? You? Us? Who?
>
>I think fame probably makes him hate he makes music.  I would hate fame too.
>
>Come on, anyone.  Give me some feedback!
>If youve already covered this before last year or something, sorry.
>
>Thanks,
>
>Carol 
>
>
>
Jaime Gonzalez          Computer Repair Technician	JGG@pilot.msu.edu    
Engineering Services	505 Computer Center	        353-5266	
Michigan State University	FAX:517/3536506

    


------------------------------

From: Trung Tran <kaytrang@utdallas.edu>
Subject: Re: The Bootleg Trading Post 

Taylor wrote: 

> > What are we going to do, kick off everyone who doesn't share the same 
> > views as us?  Come on, at least Trung is provoking some interesting
> > conversation rather than perpetuating topics such as hot dog cars and
> > Ben's ass.

> > For christ sake, at least we've got someone who will stand
> > up and speak their opinion like an individual, instead of molding their
> > views to please popular list philosophy.

Then Caryn wrote:

> so far, ever time mr. trang has posted, it's been to rile people up.
> that's why he got kicked the first time.  the ev vs. rs post was
> pointless.

Says who? I personally did have a point when I posted that Eddie Vedder/ 
RS thing. And apparently some reasonable people agreed. 

Taylor goes on to say..

> > We're in need for some good
> > fucking intelligent debates... why can't you folks argue you're point
> > without getting pissed off or attacking people as you make your point?
> > Geez...

Caryn:

> ...and if i may point out, geoff did that; but mr. trang responded by
> attacking him, not the other way around.

Actually Geoff started it. Reread his original reply to my EV/RS post and 
you will see. But hey I am man enough to realize my mistake. Geoff, I am 
sorry about that snide "Mommy" comment. But when you said that I wasn't a 
true SG fan because I bought FDR, what did you expect me to do..just sit 
here and take it? You riled me up,my friend, and I posted out of emotion. I 
should have relaxed..hypertension shouldn't be a side effect from joining this 
fine list. I don't think you realize how offending that statement was. Who are 
you to say that? I still take tremendous offense to that statement. No one 
needs to be calling anyone an untrue fan on here. Look, we are obviously at an 
impasse. You believe that if you buy a SG bootleg, then you are not a true fan.
I  disagree. I feel that you can be a true SG fan even if you purchase a boot. 
But you better realize something Geoff. If you are calling me an untrue fan, 
you are calling a lot of us on this list untrue fans because many of them have 
done the *exact* same thing that I did. And to all the members of somms, what 
do you think? Is Geoff right? Am I any less of a fan because I just happened to 
buy a CD SG boot? What do *you* think..

- -Trung Tran


------------------------------

From: Nate Crosswhite <nate@MIT.EDU>
Subject: Re: what does it mean?

>At 01:51 PM 3/18/97 -0500, Carol wrote:
>>I see on BMF it was "You make me sick I make music" or "In one ear
>>out your mother" (that one's ok).  
>> whatever you call it.So, why do you
>>spose he chose to call it the first one I mentioned? Who makes him Sick he
>>hates music?  Me? You? Us? Who?

At 03:56 PM 3/18/97 -0500, Jaime Gonzalez wrote:
>Carol,I think it means that the Music Industry makes him sick that he 
>makes music.I am generalizing of course.It is full of business types
>who are really only interested in  making money and don't give a rats ass
>about art or music or self expression.

I think you guys are reading too much into a fun play on words.
It helps if you read it out loud and pronounce it like this:
"You make me sick, I make myou-sick"

I don't think Chris meant anything personal by it. :)

Nate



------------------------------

From: Rita Bonofiglio <yu166423@YorkU.CA>
Subject: Re: Temple/Andrew/Matt/Real PJ History


> 
> it's the chemistry of all four of them that makes them so good....put matt
> and ben and kim and chris all in seperate bands.....and mind you...due to
> their success now they may do well at first....but in the long run they will
> probably end up failing....cuz well...they work great together....but apart
> they're not as good as the whole...what's the saying?...united we stand
> devided we fall?
> xo
> 

i have to severely disagree with you there, they may work well together,
but don't underestimate the talent that these guys have individually!

- -----rita b.


------------------------------

From: Shanon M Cousland <shanonc@csd.uwm.edu>
Subject: Re: Rhinosaur

	Yep. I gotta agree, Rhinosaur is good, but I've been praying for 
Tighter and Tighter to make the singles' list for quite some time. Since 
it came out, even. It is, to me, one of the greatest songs in existence. 
I don't know what else to say except that it was influence enough for me 
to (I don't expect you sommsters to condone this) overlay the graffiti in 
my park with the entire set of lyrics to the song. Milwaukee will not 
approve, but I'm way to tired of the Rap Crap that exists in an 
unneccessary-violence-filled community. 
	And to add to it, I also would like to see or hear a live version 
of Limo Wreck. Many a time has it put me to a soothing standstill 
parallel only to the mood created from a sizzling pyre. OK, poetic I am, 
but lo and behold, it was Soundgarden that did it for me. Oh, if I did 
have the band's number, I'd want to talk to Kim. I don't care if he'd 
kick the crap out of me, I'd want to at least talk to him once and see 
who he is. I also, am a Philosophy major. Little old me, signing off...

"Beneath another shovelload," -Setzer ][


------------------------------

From: KSingh2349@aol.com
Subject: a whole bunch of diff message responses

In re: soundgarden rule dated 97-03-18 15:16:56 EST, caryn rose writes:

<< (then again, isn't the quote that every band
in seattle wanted matt cameron as their drummer? ;-) )

 of course, i don't really know... none of us can really know, unless we
 engaged the relevant parties in a lengthy discussion... you can't even
 take interviews as gospel because the guys are human, after all, and don't
 have perfect memories....
  >>


well...why wouldnt everyone want matt though...he's amazing...but then
again...as i said in an earlier post....you're only as good as the people
you're with (take...sorry to bring this in...gilmour/ellet for
example..everyone thinks they're playing wiketly since their trade to
nj...but it's only cuz the guys on the ice are better - man i hate to admit
this being a leafs fan and all - than the leafs)......and as for the whole
truth behind the totd thing....let's just face it....it was
cornell/gossard/ament....vedder was brought in..he didnt take over and he did
add a lot to it (even if it was only on like 1 or 2 songs) even if he never
knew wood......

******************************************************************************
********************

In Re: Ten and Temple of the dog dated 97-03-18 15:16:56 EST, dave writes:

<<Ten came out in 1991, temple came out in the summer of 1990. Actually Ten 
came out somwhere inbetween, july and october 1991, to my understanding, 
ten was also put together and recording in one week.>>


wow...man my sources are sooo wrong....but i guess in a sense i was right
too...when a&m decided to "re-release" totd...they did so to capitalize on
the fame that (sg and) pj were having.....and like i said...i'm a sg fan
first....and i do enjoy pj..but had it not been for vedder's face across
hunger strike....i wouldnt have cought my first glimpse of cornell

******************************************************************************
********************

In re: soundgarden rule dated 97-03-18 16:31:32 EST, Rita Bonofiglio write:

<< no matter who or what started anything, i still miss andy wood =( >>


honestly...i never heard anything of andy's...nor do i know anything about
him....sorry guys.....just letting you know

******************************************************************************
********************

alright...well i hope you guys like this new method of my responses....i
realized that maybe i was taking up too much room with too many posts...sorry
guys for the inconvienience.....
xo



------------------------------

From: SJordet@aol.com
Subject: Re: what does it mean?

Carol wrote:
>I have always wondered what this meant exactly. "You Make Me Sick I Make
Music.>

I believe the somewhat of an answer (or Chris' explanation) for this is on an
eight or nine minute interview on the second BIMH single. This is pretty much
what Chris said about it:

"...Kim's (publishing title) I like is 'In One Ear and Out Your Mother'. Kim
and I actually got into a contest to see who could come up with the most
ridiculous publishing title. The thing I like about it the most is when other
bands do covers of my songs, you see on their album jacket the title 'You
Make Me Sick, I Make Music.'"

Not the real answer to your question, but at least it's some kind of input.
;) 

Taylor wrote:
<Come on, at least Trung is provoking some interesting conversation rather
than perpetuating topics such as hot dog cars and Ben's ass.>

I wouldn't exactly call Trung's comments interesting - I think "insulting"
would fit the description better. Okay, I'll admit that you don't have to be
Kim to discuss Ben's ass and hot dog cars, but they at least (well, the hot
dog cars, anyway) bring a little bit of humor to some peoples' days. I
respect people who stand up for themselves and  don't "mold their views to
please popular list philosophy," but I don't have quite as much respect for
people who somehow manage to verbally assault and humiliate other people in
the process. And if you really can't stand the retardation everyone else
seems to be displaying around your holy feet with their petty little chatter,
then you think of some topic we all can converse intelligently, won't get
bored of in four days, and won't end up insulting other people in the
process. It's not quite as easy as you might think.

Please pardon any typos or misspellings - I've had enough over the counter
drugs to drop a giraffe and my fingers are cold.

Benlover

  


------------------------------

From: Ali@Worldnet.att.net
Subject: Re: The Bootleg Trading Post 

Trung Tran wrote:
>  
>  And to all the members of somms, what
> do you think? Is Geoff right? Am I any less of a fan because I just happened to
> buy a CD SG boot? What do *you* think..
> 
> -Trung Tran

If you were not a fan of SG I doubt very seriously that you would even 
bother to buy anything by them at all, much less a Boot. The bottom line 
is its not what we think,its what *you* think. You know how you feel or 
dont feel about SG, not whether or not your a *true* SG fan just because 
you buy one thing or another. And quite frankly who really gives a 
crap one way or the other. But if thats how Geoff feels he's perfectly 
welcome to voice his opinion. It doesnt necessarily make him right and 
you wrong or vice versa. As Seth said in an earlier response, we (SG 
fans) need to support them by eventually buying the authorized copies 
of releases at some point and time (not your exact words Seth, but I 
think you get my drift),but that does not mean that if you find a good 
copy of a boot that you shouldnt by it because its going to make you 
less of a SG fan then someone else. Dont let anyone tell you diffrently.
 
I've often wondered how SG feels about Boots. I havent heard any of them 
make a fuss about them, but then again I could be Dead Wrong.. 

responses...........

ali......

p.s. Congratulations Seth!!!!!!!1
     300,000 and counting.....

I'll just be glad when they come back around here...

------------------------------

From: Kristian Koukal <kristian@sonicignition.com>
Subject: sonicignition

Hello.

I am responsible for some Soundgarden stuff on the sonicignition.com web =
page.  Was wondering if I could get a little feedback from the crew.  =
It's interview and live stuff.  Hit me with the comments at =
kristian@sonicignition.com   there's some kim wisdom and spoonman live =
with frame grabs of chris live.  I took those shots from the pit last =
fall in Virginia at Patriot center.  I had to move to avoid Chris's =
boot!!  It was so intense.  I'm from seattle so it was cool to be close =
to SG in a place that big.  Thanks.  kristian


------------------------------

From: Geoff <gkleemol@callisto.uwinnipeg.ca>
Subject: Re: soundgarden rules

I believe Caryn has it correct.  As I recall TOTD was released before
TEN came out, and the video for Hunger Strike appeared after Ten bacame
a smash-hit, and Pearl Jam "broke".  It seems that A&M were out to make
some cash by pushing the project which included members of PJ.
Geoff


caryn rose wrote:
> 
> eddie had come up to seattle and was hanging around, and thus was INVITED
> by the temple members to participate in the recording. remember, totd was
> a one off created in tribute to a dead friend; it was never meant to be a
> commercial success and it wasn't when it was first released.  there wasn't
> even a video
> 
> then, sg and pj began to skyrocket in popularity and A&M (not totd, not
> pj, not vedder, jesus, you people have such prejudices) decided to
> re-release and promote totd in order to capitalize on the success of both
> of those bands.  again:  totd was already recorded and released.  eddie
> wasn't brought in by anyone because why they were recording it he was
> still no one, just this surfer dude from san diego who had just joined
> this new band, mookie blaylock.  no one in the band made the decision to
> do this; the record company did. (and yes, the record company can choose
> to do whatever it wants to to promote an album; they cannot force the
> artists to participate, but they can decide to start pushing something
> again)
> 
> remember, temple was chris and stone and jeff for the most part; do you
> think anyone could have made them include vedder if they didn't want to?
> if eddie was as talentless as some of you make him out to be, why would
> they invite him to participate?  again, he was NO ONE at the time... pearl
> jam were no one at the time...
> 
> please, pearl jam bashing to the usual address.  let's keep it off here.
> 
> --caryn

------------------------------

From: Geoff <gkleemol@callisto.uwinnipeg.ca>
Subject: Re: The Bootleg Trading Post

Trung Tran wrote:
> 
> Actually Geoff started it. Reread his original reply to my EV/RS post and
> you will see. But hey I am man enough to realize my mistake. Geoff, I am

Ok, about the EV/RS thing...my reply to your post was probably more out
of emotion than anything, but I did apologize for my tone.  But I
thought it was a pointless post.  Eddie's personality is not an
appropriate topic for this list.  And it seems to me to be pointless to
post about Chris's personality and reaction to the RS story when
*nobody* knows what the truth is except maybe EV and the rest of PJ.  My
perception was that you were assuming that the article was a veridical
representation of reality.  It's a magazine.  It's more concerned with
what the musicians are wearing than anything about the music.  If you
want to discuss EV and this thing further, we should move it into amp-j.

> sorry about that snide "Mommy" comment. But when you said that I wasn't a
> true SG fan because I bought FDR, what did you expect me to do..just sit
> here and take it? You riled me up,my friend, and I posted out of emotion. I
> should have relaxed..hypertension shouldn't be a side effect from joining this
> fine list. I don't think you realize how offending that statement was. Who are
> you to say that? I still take tremendous offense to that statement. No one
> needs to be calling anyone an untrue fan on here. Look, we are obviously at an
> impasse. You believe that if you buy a SG bootleg, then you are not a true fan.
> I  disagree. I feel that you can be a true SG fan even if you purchase a boot.
> But you better realize something Geoff. If you are calling me an untrue fan,
> you are calling a lot of us on this list untrue fans because many of them have
> done the *exact* same thing that I did. And to all the members of somms, what
> do you think? Is Geoff right? Am I any less of a fan because I just happened to
> buy a CD SG boot? What do *you* think..

Go back and reread my post.  It does not say *anywhere* that you are an
untrue fan because you bought a bootleg.  Your quote was, "But only a
fan would get a bootleg,", and I do not believe that to be true.  I'm
sure there are many people who own boots just for some kind of status
thing, or purely to make money or trade for other boots.  I am a fan and
I have no immediate desire to buy a bootleg.  I like Soundgarden;  I
like their music, and I don't mind giving them my money.  Bottlegs are
not made by fans, nor are they made *for* fans.  They are made for
greedy people to make money off somebody else's talent.  I think it
would be completely different if a person were to go out, tape a show
and *trade* it to others for other shows.  That seems to be a fan-based
activity.  But I choose not to support the bloodsuckers.  Clearly we
have different opinions, and I'm glad to see that you can debate this
rationally, rather spouting off like a child.  In summary, you have your
reasons for buying boots, and I have my reasons not to buy boots.  What
else can be said?
Geoff

> 
> -Trung Tran

------------------------------

From: blind dog <s325961@student.uq.edu.au>
Subject: singing golden words in a broken voice...

On Tue, 18 Mar 1997, Geoff wrote:

> I believe Caryn has it correct.  As I recall TOTD was released before
> TEN came out, and the video for Hunger Strike appeared after Ten bacame
> a smash-hit, and Pearl Jam "broke".  It seems that A&M were out to make
> some cash by pushing the project which included members of PJ.

	sorry for the "yeah, me too" post fellow sommsters, but as far as
I can tell both geoff and caryn are right (as was rita when she noted that
the project was originally chris' idea). the first two tracks from _temple
of the dog_ were originally to be released by chris as a single, probably
through a&m; purely as a tribute to the memory of andrew wood. chris
proceded to contact stone gossard and jeff ament (members of mother love
bone with wood), asking them to record the songs with him. matt cameron
joined the three and the group came up with enough material for the album
most of us own. eddie vedder was merely an audience to these sessions and
was asked by the band to provide backing vocals on a number of tracks (as
andrew d. correctly pointed out).

	besides being a tribute born of sincerity and not commercial greed
(as some listers have insinuated), the record was also technically
released before pearl jam were even fully formed or realised. _ten_ was
yet to be released, as was _badmotorfinger_ (see the radio interview of
1991 with chris, jeff and stone which should be up on sgi.net by the end
of next week). the feeling of hype was fostered not by the band (even
though they agreed to the 'hunger strike' video and single) but most
likely by their record label. 


		       -----------------------------------
		     it doesn't bother me as long as you know
			     words by chris cornell
                       -----------------------------------







------------------------------

From: Geoff <gkleemol@callisto.uwinnipeg.ca>
Subject: Re: what does it mean?

I was about to say the exact same thing.  "you make me sick I make music
" is not a sentence.  It is completely ungrammatical.  I think it's just
a play on sounds, as pointed out below.
Geoff

Nate Crosswhite wrote:
> I think you guys are reading too much into a fun play on words.
> It helps if you read it out loud and pronounce it like this:
> "You make me sick, I make myou-sick"
> 
> I don't think Chris meant anything personal by it. :)
> 
> Nate

------------------------------

From: endless_nameless@prodigy.com (GRRL NIKI   FREER)
Subject: Re: Temple/Andrew/Matt/Real PJ History

rita b. wrote:
>>
but apart  they're not as good as the whole...what's the saying?...
united we stand
devided we fall?
<<
>
i have to severely disagree with you there, they may work well 
together,
but don't underestimate the talent that these guys have 
individually!
<
 i'd have to agree with rita on this one. ben, kim, matt, and chris 
equal on hell of a music group, but on their own they are still 
amazing  musicians. look at hater! look at "seasons" and the acoustic 
version of "like suicide" !! look at matt's tone dogs side! these 
guys are loaded! and kim, what band wouldn't want kim as their lead 
guitarist? the PUSA (presidents of the united states...ect.) had him 
play on a track on their album. these guys are in demand.
and especially look at TOTD. amazing amazing material. each member is 
his own musical talent and deserves to be recognized as so. 
 besides, what would JCP have sounded like if all 4 boys hadn't 
combined in the effort? each lended his own personal talent and look 
what came out-- one of the most powerful songs (***i believe***) to 
have ever been written.
  mind riot

____
we see you cry
turn your head
then we slap your face
we see you try
see you fail
some things never change...

------------------------------

From: CL Miller <clmiller@usachoice.net>
Subject: puss 'n boots

On a solemn March day, you wrote:

> for those of you who own the mother love bone album 'thing' with 
> both _shine_ and _apple_ on it, you'll note that there's a song andy 
> wrote called "stargazer." well, as i was listening to "say hello 2 
> heaven" for the 800th time the other night, i read the lyrics sheet 
> along with it and the line "poor stargazer/she's got no tears in her 
> eyes" hit me. the song by andy is about a she, and this line from 
> SH2H is also a 'she' line. 
>  <"is there a point here?" wonders SOMMSters galore.>
>  yeah, i'm thinking, 'is this kind of a mention of andy himself in a 
> song chris blatantly wrote about him, or is this just some kind of 
> accident (lack of better word here) <possibly subconsiously?> that 
> coincidentally had a lot to do with andy's writings?'
>  um...anyone who can make sense of that share yr opinion... = )

Yes, Niki, Chris wrote "say hello 2 heaven" and "reach down" about
Andrew Wood.  I believe that most of the album (being dedicated to Andy)
has something or other in reference to Andy.  Just take a listen to
"times of trouble".

I agree with Seth about bootlegs.  It is not fair to the band if they
have gone through what they do to write and record songs and then have
someone take the profits for their work away from them.  If you
(KAISERVRBL) think that it doesn't hurt anyone, then go into your
nearest Tower Records or Blockbuster, and steal a few thousand dollars. 
I'm sure that the company doesn't need it.

Love you all!

Chris

- -- 
		

		Thank you for allowing me to babble incessantly!

			Check out my store's homepage!

			 http://www.MovieStop.com

			My favorite quote of the week:

		"You ate my ear. . .you killed your wife. . .
			. . .you framed me. . .and you're mad
				at me for LYING?"

					~~ keanu reeves
					feeling minnesota

------------------------------

From: Sndgdnfan@aol.com
Subject: Re: The Soundgarden Bootleg Trading Post

My friend has Fresh Deadly Rarities and it is great!  It is almost every
b-side you could want.  If Soundgarden cared about losing their dollar or two
buck royalty they got for an album they would put something out like FDR or
make their B-sides more available.  Anyway, I heard Chris Cornell himself say
on the radio that Matt Cameron bought a Soundgarden bootleg and he wasn't
upset about it.  He actually enjoyed listening to the rare songs on it.  If
Chris Cornell isn't going to worry about the buck fifty neither am I.
- -pete

------------------------------

From: Candy <haun@ionet.net>
Subject: Re: soundgarden rules

> I believe Caryn has it correct.  As I recall TOTD was released before
> TEN came out, and the video for Hunger Strike appeared after Ten bacame
> a smash-hit, and Pearl Jam "broke".  It seems that A&M were out to make
> some cash by pushing the project which included members of PJ.
> Geoff

I believe that the Hunger Strike video also came out before Ten was
released. I'm pretty sure that I remember seeing it a couple of times on
Headbanger's Ball and being surprised that there was a video for it, as
none of the band members were well known at that time. Then later, after
Ten was a big hit, they started showing the second, slightly different
version of the Hunger Strike video regularly on MTV.

Candy


------------------------------

From: David Miller <pjdave@flash.net>
Subject: SG/Living Colour

Hey, today I realized how good LTL really is!  I mean, I used to like it a
lot, but now I listened to it a lot closer today, and it's really cool.  I
was looking through the liner notes, and they thank Living Colour.  And I
also have Vernon Reid's(guitarist of now-defunct Ling Colour) new solo
album, Mistaken Identity.  In his liner notes, he thanks SG.  Anybody know
the relationship betw these 2 bands.  

PS--please, this list does not always have to be in arguments, people can
post their opinions to an extent.  Draw the line when you're insulting
someone else.  It doesn't matter who started it, try to be mature about it,
and please, WHEN FLAMING, DO IT PRIVATELY!!!  Nobody on this list wants to
hear you insult someone else.  Some people on this list just get too
defensive about things.  This is just a suggestion, if you're going to
flame, do it straight to me.  It's annoying to go through endless messages
that have no meaning to me.  I'm probably one of the youngest members on
this list, and we should all try to be more grown up about things.  Guess
this was a pretty long PS, sorry.
Dave Miller
*********************************************
*I like to trade bootlegs.                  *
*Check out my Pearl Jam homepage at:        *
*http://pwp.starnetinc.com/gwm/pearl.htm    *
*You can find my bootlist there             *
*PEARL JAM AND SOUNDGARDEN RULE!            *
*********************************************

------------------------------

End of somms Digest [Volume 3 Issue 70]
***************************************
