From: somms@mit.edu
To: somms-digest@mit.edu
Subject: Soundgarden Digest, Sunday,  3 Sep 1995
Reply-To: somms@mit.edu
Date: Sun, 03 Sep 1995 01:01:25 EDT
Sender: saperl

 
The Soundgarden Digest:  Sunday,  3 Sep 1995

listadmin:    saperl@mit.edu
list archive: http://web.mit.edu/saperl/sg/archive/archive.html

Today's Topics:
 

                                  Re: HORDE
                Re: Soundgarden Digest, Thursday, 31 Aug 1995
                Re: Soundgarden Digest, Saturday, 2 Sep 1995
                           I'm writing a column...
             (fwd) Re: Soundgarden Digest, Thursday, 31 Aug 1995
                            Chris and friends....
                Re: Soundgarden Digest, Thursday, 31 Aug 1995
                            Re: Re:Chris's Themes

------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Fri, 1 Sep 1995 22:44:08 -0700 (PDT)
From: Matt Toomey <mtoomey@slonet.org>
To: somms@MIT.EDU
Subject: Re: HORDE

Not that any of you probably care, but I'm going to HORDE this weekend to 
see the best rock n' roll band of our generation - The Black Crowes.  
Don' flame me you, i don't consider Soundgarden to be "rock n' roll."



^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Matthew Ian Toomey
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^   "Man was born to love-
				       ^   Though often he has sought
				       ^   Like Icarus, to fly too high.
				       ^   And far too lonely than he ought
				       ^   To kiss the sun of east and west
				       ^   And hold the world at his behest-
				       ^   To hold the terrible power
				       ^   To whom only gods are blessed-
				       ^   But me, I am just a MAN."
			 	       ^
				       ^		-M. Patton
			               ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
                                            
                                      
						                    


------------------------------

Date: Sat, 02 Sep 1995 02:01:35 EDT
From: AFNJ84A@prodigy.com (MR CASEY C CAUGHRON)
To: somms@MIT.EDU
Subject: Re: Soundgarden Digest, Thursday, 31 Aug 1995

- -- [ From: Casey Caughron * EMC.Ver #2.10P ] --


> 
> Date: Wed, 30 Aug 1995 21:39:35 EDT
> From: mrl5@Lehigh.EDU (ClownWithBazooka)
> Subject: (fwd) weekly ranting
> To: somms@MIT.EDU
> 
> 
> Comments on weekly ranting
> >    I think that pearl Jam was looking for a quick buck with
vitalogy. 

     I can tell that most of you people are not musicians or play in
any bands.
Most bands sign a contract for a certain amount of albums.  The bands
get paid
the same regardless. (some contracts allow royalties).  Pearl Jam may
have been
rushed.  Who knows.

	There are lots of bands that are still independent and full of energy 
(has any one
heard of ZOOM, Panel Donor, Molly Mcguire?)  I have to admitt that I do
listen to a lot more 'local' bands 
than I do 'major label' but a couple bands arround here have signed to
a 'major'
	
	Has anyone heard of these 'local' bands now on a 'major label'

	Season to Risk
	Kill Creek
	Truck Stop Love
	Shiner
	Grither
	Paw (I know you have heard of them)

Here is a couple true alternative bands
			The Voluputous Horror of Karen Black
			Ed Hall


	GOON
      


------------------------------

Date: Sat, 02 Sep 1995 02:32:29 EDT
From: AFNJ84A@prodigy.com (MR CASEY C CAUGHRON)
To: somms@MIT.EDU
Subject: Re: Soundgarden Digest, Saturday,  2 Sep 1995

- -- [ From: Casey Caughron * EMC.Ver #2.10P ] --

 
> Date: Fri, 1 Sep 1995 17:34:54 +1000
> To: somms@MIT.EDU
> From: mm328995@minmet.uq.oz.au (John Grieves)
> Subject: Alternate rant
> 
> Just while we're talking about the whole alternative thing, I thought
I'd
> add my three penneth or so:
> 
> 1. Alternative is a subjective term - it's like the term larger, it
means
> different things to different people in different situations. To me,
> alternative means different to something - hence, alternative music
to me
> means Mariah Carey stuff, to a Mariah Carey fan it means Soundgarden.
I
> reckon scrap the whole term as trying to apply to a type of music -
it
> makes no sense anymore.
> 
> 2. Labelling a band "alternative" does not make that band good or bad
- - a
> label can be used to ill-effect at times. What I'm getting at is that
a
> band can be liked or disliked by a group of people just due to it
being
> called alternative, and this is not good - listen to the music and
then
> decide.
> 
> 3. It doesn't make a lick of difference to a band's music whether the
band
> is alternative or not - take for instance, Soundgarden -
Soundgarden's
> music is Soundgarden's music, regardless of whether they are
alternative,
> pop, heavy metal, classical etc.etc.
> 
> Hopefully this has made some sense, and I'd like to hear someone's
> comments, but please, don't fall into the trap of having to label
bands
> and only like bands that fall into certain categories - OK?
> 
> Jackhammer.

	
	I played in a band called Rusty Mama and the most asked, and also the 
hardest to answer, was "What kind of music do you play".  I would
always answer
"Well I play Rusty Mama music" (never good enough).  I had to resort to
descriptions like:
		
		"Alternative"  we were definately different
		"Punk"  at times
		"Country"  at times
		"Cow Punk"  the most used by us
		"Rock-a-Billy"  like the Reverend Horton Heat 
		"Rock and Roll"
		Oh yeah, I can forget the self gratifying "Good Music"

	What it all came down to is you need to listen to us (or any band) and
make your
own descission.  You either like us or dislike us.  It doesn't matter
what "type" or "kind" of
music it is.  There are only two choices:  'I like'  &   'I don't like'
Don't resort to the choices 'good'  &  'bad'  because you can like bad
music if it keeps your 
interest.

		GOON


------------------------------

Date: Fri, 1 Sep 1995 16:17:55 -0400
From: MoonDruid@aol.com
To: somms@MIT.EDU
Subject: I'm writing a column...

Hey! I got a spot, the music column, for the high school newspaper. That
means that I gotta come up with a name for it.
Whadday think...SOMMS Digest?
Somebody give me some ideas.

Moon Druid

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 02 Sep 1995 20:01:08 EDT
From: mrl5@Lehigh.EDU (ClownWithBazooka)
Subject: (fwd) Re: Soundgarden Digest, Thursday, 31 Aug 1995
To: somms@MIT.EDU


>
>
> Comments on weekly ranting
> >    I think that pearl Jam was looking for a quick buck with
vitalogy.

<     I can tell that most of you people are not musicians or play in
< any bands.
< Most bands sign a contract for a certain amount of albums.  The bands
< get paid
< the same regardless. (some contracts allow royalties).  Pearl Jam may
< have been
< rushed.  Who knows.

    If they get paid the same regardless why rush the damn album? There
        still going to get paid. Secondly a majority of artists get royalties
        per album, and if Pearl Jam followed in the path of Soundgarden or any
        other musicians with common sense, they have established they're own
        publishing companies for there music so they would definitely get
        royalties per album sold. Third if they just cared about the music(The
        whole ticketmaster thing) they would have waited to sign with a  major
        label that offered a contract to benefit them. Since soundgarden went
        major label first they definitely had to have advice that could have
        helped them. Plus you know little about business, if vs. goes
        platinium in a week, the next album will have success of a similar
        magnitude, therefore waiting a few months to record the album could
        easily be used as a propaganda trick to generate anticipation for a
        new album, I heard a million times about a new album coming out by a
        band that was 2 years in the making, that statement is commonly used
        as propaganda. Btw, I will keep knocking Pearl Jam untill I see fit to
        stop.
            Clown With Bazooka


        There are lots of bands that are still independent and full of energy
(has any one
heard of ZOOM, Panel Donor, Molly Mcguire?)  I have to admitt that I do
listen to a lot more 'local' bands
than I do 'major label' but a couple bands arround here have signed to
a 'major'

        Has anyone heard of these 'local' bands now on a 'major label'

        Season to Risk
        Kill Creek
        Truck Stop Love
        Shiner
        Grither
        Paw (I know you have heard of them)

Here is a couple true alternative bands
                        The Voluputous Horror of Karen Black
                        Ed Hall


        GOON




------------------------------

Date: Sat, 2 Sep 1995 18:56:35 -0600 (MDT)
From: DEWGod <anthonyr@ucsub.colorado.edu>
To: somms@MIT.EDU
Subject: Chris and friends....

I am quite new to the list, so as my first message to all, i would just 
like to say that SOUNDGARDEN FUCKIN' KICKS ASS. Have a nice day.

Lovin it Loud,
That one new home skillet

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 2 Sep 1995 02:37:04 -0400 (EDT)
From: Jeff Rollason <d010889c@dcfreenet.seflin.lib.fl.us>
Subject: Re: Soundgarden Digest, Thursday, 31 Aug 1995
To: somms@MIT.EDU


On Sat, 2 Sep 1995, MR CASEY C CAUGHRON wrote:

>      I can tell that most of you people are not musicians or play in
> any bands.
> Most bands sign a contract for a certain amount of albums.  The bands
> get paid
> the same regardless. (some contracts allow royalties).  Pearl Jam may
> have been
> rushed.  Who knows.

  Actually, bands such as Pearl Jam, who do receive royalties, may very 
  likely churn out an album because it will make them a "quick buck".  
  Whether it's true in the case of Vitalogy, I don't know (or care).
  
  Also, for your info, bands who sign to majors usually sign for a 
  certain number of albums plus a certain number of options, in which 
  the label has the option to release the record or not. 

  As far as royalties go, if you know anyone who is signed to a major or 
  a large indie, and they write their own songs, but are not receiving 
  any royalties (on top of their per diem or salary), then they are 
  getting screwed (assuming they're selling records, of course).

  Jeff

------------------------------

Date: Sun, 3 Sep 1995 14:32:30 +1000 (EST)
From: Avatar <bartramb@student.gu.edu.au>
To: somms@MIT.EDU
Subject: Re: Re:Chris's Themes

On Sat, 2 Sep 1995, LITTLE JOE wrote:

> On Thu, 31 Aug 1995, Tony Dawe wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, 24 Aug 1995, ClownWithBazooka wrote:
> > 
> > > a couple. btw, how is naked in the cold sun a contradiction? Being naked does
> > 
> > try the sun being cold. the sun is usaly warm.
> 
> You guys are really obsessed with those fourth of july lyrics. I can't 
> believe you are having such a big debate about being 'naked in the cold sun'
> It's a song about the aftermath of nuclear war, the cold sun Chris is 
> referring to is most likely the sun obscured by the fallout after a 
> nuclear explosion.
> 
> 
> 	    	       ___________________________
>                       = ALIVE IN THE SUPERUNKNOWN =
> 	  	       ===========================                        

Yeah, probably... but no matter what it all means, 4th of July is still a 
great song. It adds to the diversity of the music on Superunknown, even 
if the lyrics are wierd, have a go at this one:

Pale in the flarelight, the scared light cracks and disappears...

Can anyone suggest how light could be scared or crack? 
 
- - Brad

------------------------------

End of somms Digest [Volume 1 Issue 34]
***************************************
