From: somms@MIT.EDU
To: somms-digest@MIT.EDU
Subject: Soundgarden Digest, Tuesday,  8 Aug 1995
Reply-To: somms@MIT.EDU
Date: Tue, 08 Aug 1995 01:30:45 EDT
Sender: saperl@MIT.EDU

 
The Soundgarden Digest:  Tuesday,  8 Aug 1995
 
Today's Topics:
 

                                    Fun!!
                            to pop or not to pop
                                Regarding Fun
                          Re: to pop or not to pop
                               Favourite Bands
                                  web site?
                                  Fav Bands
                                RE: web site?
                                Re: Not Pop!
                                RE: web site?
                                Re: web site?
                                 fave bands
                          Re: to pop or not to pop
                              network tv sucks
                              Louder than Love
                                 Fave Bands
                                Re: Not Pop!
                           anyone like jack irons?
                   Re: SG is a pop band + Other good bands
                                  Re: Fun!!
                          Re: to pop or not to pop
                            Re: Louder than Love
                            chris and the poppies
                          stickin' up for the boys
                      95-07-19.html#Chris_Cornell (fwd)

------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Mon, 7 Aug 1995 14:34:55 +1000 (GMT+1000)
From: LITTLE JOE <s327857@student.uq.edu.au>
To: soundgarden list <somms@MIT.EDU>
Subject: Fun!!

O.k, last week I posted an article titled 'Let's have some fun' asking 
you for your ultimate band lineup and your Desert island discs...As 
promised I 
have collated your responses and posted them below. Thanks for your 
numerous responses, more than I expected.

First Team All-World Ultimate Band.              2nd Team
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~          ~~~~~~~~~~~
Vocals- Chris Cornell (Soundgarden)           - Kurt Cobain
Lead Guitar- Jimi Hendrix                     - Jerry Cantrell
Bass- Les Claypool (Primus)                   - Krist Novoselic
Drums- Will Calhoun (Living Colour)           - Lars Ulrich

nunpuncher@easynet.co.uk suggested he should be on bass

Desert Island Discs.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1. Superunknown (4 votes)
2. Badmotorfinger (4 votes)
3. Siamese Dream (2 votes)
4. Nevermind  (2)
+ a wide variety of stuff that got one vote.

I might limit the categories to one this week so this thing doesn't dry 
up in the first couple weeks.

- - Post and tell me what you think are the three best and three worst 
Soundgarden songs.

	    	       ___________________________
                      = ALIVE IN THE SUPERUNKNOWN =
	  	       ===========================                        



------------------------------

Date: Mon, 7 Aug 1995 15:22:19 +1000 (GMT+1000)
From: blind dog <s325961@student.uq.edu.au>
To: The Garden <somms@MIT.EDU>
Subject: to pop or not to pop


  By pop I mean popular, NOT pop-sounding.  Musical
> styles are so screwed up now-a-days that some bands like SG wouldn't really
> belong anywhere if the same ones that existed 10 years ago were still used.
> Some people try though.  What's popular defines what is pop music now.
> 
> POP now-a-days is just that - whatever is popular.  Lots of "Alternative",
> "Metal", and "Grunge" is pop, even if you don't understand why.  I admit SG
> is pop, but they're still a great band. > 
> Whatever . . . what I was surprised to see was that the other bands you
> guys like are all POP.  I was hoping to see some GOOD, unknown (i.e.
> non-pop) bands - maybe even some I haven't heard of that I would then check
> out.

	I would argue that pop music is not whatever is popular.  does 
that mean that any band that gets into the charts with only one song is a 
pop band?  is your band a pop band if your song spends three weeks at 
number 38?  I don't understand where the line is being drawn here.  I 
would argue that soundgarden is not a 'popular' band at all.  I feel that 
there are a lot of differences between their music and music by bands 
such as boys to men and the like.

	furthermore, are all bands which are 'known' relegated to popdom 
for ever?  and are all those bands who receive no press the true grunge 
or alternative? (I hate those terms)

	labelling bands is imho pretty uncool.  a more simple way of 
doing it is to compare them to other bands, in a single band fashion, so 
you don't get caught up in the big music movement.

	that's it from me

	justin
> 
> But NO.
> 
> So, here's my list of good non-pop bands - albums worth checking out in ().
> (I still very much like pop bands AiC, FNM, Primus, Metallica, Nirvana).
> 
> **Kyuss ("blues for the red sun", "sky valley")
> **Mule (any)
> **Fugazi - semi-pop (any & all)
> **Godflesh (any)
> **Bullet Lavolta ("swandive" & others)
> Voivod (any)
> Fudge Tunnel (any)
> Monster Magnet (any)
> Hater
> Chucklehead ("big wet kiss")
> Bim Skala Bim (any)
> Danzig - OK, pop (#1)
> Boss Hog
> Thumper
> ** Please do yourself a favor & give these bands a serious listen.
> 
> How many have heard of these bands?
> OK, enough talk.  What bands (pop & non-pop) do you like?
> 
> Adios,
> -Paul-
> 
> 
> 
> 

                       -----------------------------------
                        a thousand doors, a thousand lies
                           rooms a thousand years wide 
                       -----------------------------------


------------------------------

Date: Mon, 07 Aug 1995 09:48:05 EDT
From: mrl5@Lehigh.EDU (Muhammad Lee)
Subject: Regarding Fun
To: somms@MIT.EDU



O.k, last week I posted an article titled 'Let's have some fun' asking
you for your ultimate band lineup and your Desert island discs...As
promised I
have collated your responses and posted them below. Thanks for your
numerous responses, more than I expected.

First Team All-World Ultimate Band.              2nd Team
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~          ~~~~~~~~~~~
Vocals- Chris Cornell (Soundgarden)           - Kurt Cobain
Lead Guitar- Jimi Hendrix                     - Jerry Cantrell
Bass- Les Claypool (Primus)                   - Krist Novoselic
Drums- Will Calhoun (Living Colour)           - Lars Ulrich



nunpuncher@easynet.co.uk suggested he should be on bass

Desert Island Discs.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1. Superunknown (4 votes)
2. Badmotorfinger (4 votes)
3. Siamese Dream (2 votes)
4. Nevermind  (2)
+ a wide variety of stuff that got one vote.

I might limit the categories to one this week so this thing doesn't dry
up in the first couple weeks.

- - Post and tell me what you think are the three best and three worst
Soundgarden songs.

                       ___________________________
                      = ALIVE IN THE SUPERUNKNOWN =
                       ===========================


To all fun lovers,
    I have a slight question about the selections to the ultimate band list, I
    think the people who voted picked the best musicians but not the musicians
    who sound the best together, I think the second team band would sound
    better than the first team band. Jimi hendrix's on the spot improvisation
    and high pitched elctric guitar would sound good with les bass but not
    with will drumming or chris's vocals or his songs. Imagine if this was the
    original soundgarden lineup, you would completely lose that crunchy
    "grunge" sound the songs 4th of july or let me drowm,  holy water, gun ,
    Beyond the wheel would just sound like crap. Does anyone out there agree
    with me?


------------------------------

Date: Mon, 7 Aug 1995 12:06:31 -0400
To: somms@MIT.EDU
From: pavr@umich.edu (Paul Van Rompay)
Subject: Re: to pop or not to pop

Well, I received some interesting replies to my post: 'SG is pop band &
other good bands', most of which were posted to the group.  In one sense I
must apologize for my being a bit over-zealous in throwing out a strict
definition of a pop band.  But by the thoughtful responses I received to it,
I think it was worth it.

Two of the responses are worth noting here.  Clown w/ Bazooka refined his
definition of pop band as those bands that create "prefabricated
commercialized fake music made for no other purpose then to climb the pop
charts."  I must agree those bands exist, but who creates the standards by
which these "pop bands" create their crap.  SG, in some sense, is a part of
that.

blind dog also threw in a challenge to my definition which brought up some
great questions which I must admit I cannot answer based upon my definition.
His suggestion was to "compare them to other bands, in a single band
fashion, so you don't get caught up in the big music movement."  Once again
I must admit this makes sense to me.

I guess I really posted 'SG is pop band' to see what you guys really think
about this labelling crap.  I've been confused by it for a while as in 'how
do you describe music to other people?'  Most people use the labels and if
you're on the receiving end, that might make the difference whether you ever
listen to the band.

I only listened to SG during their early Badmotorfinger days although I had
heard of them when they were opening with FNM for Voivod (way back when).
At that time though, someone said 'Oh, you like DRI (a short-lived period),
you'll like SG'.  I refused to listen to them since someone had tried to
label what I liked.

Oh, well, thanks for your replies.

- -Paul-


BTW, any women on this mailing list - I feel a bit guilty using 'guys' but
that's what I usually call everyone.


------------------------------

Date: Mon, 7 Aug 1995 18:20:17 +0200
To: somms@MIT.EDU
From: eteman@knoware.nl (Peter Vermeulen)
Subject: Favourite Bands

My favourite bands:

Soundgarden of course
Offpring
Green Day
Smashing Pumpkins
Bush ( only " little things " and  "everything zen " )
Pearl Jam
Nirvana
Stone temple pilots
Therapy?
Alice in chains
Silverchair
Terrorvision
Dog eat Dog
Live


Peter



L.A.P.D.

They're shooting anyone who even tries to run
They're shooting little kids with toy guns
Take it to a jury, they don't give a damn
Because the one who tells the truth is always the policeman.

( Offspring - L.A.P.D.
   from the album IGNITION )


Peter Vermeulen
e-mail: peteman@knoware.nl
adres: Tuindersweg 3a 
woonplaats: Leermens



------------------------------

From: "VASANT RAMAMURTHY" <vman@ctdnet.acns.nwu.edu>
Subject: web site?
To: somms@MIT.EDU
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 1995 11:30:48 -0600 (CDT)

Does anybody know the URL of the Soundgarden web page?
- -- 
"Life's a bummer, when you're a hummer" - "Hummer" by Smashing Pumpkins
Vasant Ramamurthy
vman@ctdnet.acns.nwu.edu
Vasant.Ramamurthy@launchpad.unc.edu

------------------------------

From: "VASANT RAMAMURTHY" <vman@ctdnet.acns.nwu.edu>
Subject: Fav Bands
To: somms@MIT.EDU
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 1995 11:31:12 -0600 (CDT)

Here are my favorite bands:

Soundgarden
Pearl Jam
Nirvana
Jimi Hendrix
The Doors
Smashing Pumpkins
Led Zeppelin
Foo Fighters
Gumball
The Beatles
The Ramones
- -- 
"Life's a bummer, when you're a hummer" - "Hummer" by Smashing Pumpkins
Vasant Ramamurthy
vman@ctdnet.acns.nwu.edu
Vasant.Ramamurthy@launchpad.unc.edu

------------------------------

From: Michael Barnes <MichaelB@humongous.com>
To: somms <somms@MIT.EDU>
Subject: RE: web site?
Date: Mon, 07 Aug 95 10:11:00 PDT


I'd be interested in this as well. Does anybody know the URL of the Pearl 
Jam or STP web page?

MichaelB@Humongous.com

*** Korea, Canada or maybe Taiwan ***
 ----------
From: VASANT RAMAMURTHY
To: somms
Subject: web site?
Date: Monday, August 07, 1995 11:30AM

Does anybody know the URL of the Soundgarden web page?
 --
"Life's a bummer, when you're a hummer" - "Hummer" by Smashing Pumpkins
Vasant Ramamurthy
vman@ctdnet.acns.nwu.edu
Vasant.Ramamurthy@launchpad.unc.edu

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 7 Aug 1995 13:40:34 -0400 (EDT)
From: nicholas anthony budor <nickyb@engin.umich.edu>
Subject: Re: Not Pop!
To: Muhammad Lee <mrl5@lehigh.edu>
Cc: Ahmed Osman <Ahmed.Osman@Bentley.COM>, somms@MIT.EDU

Do you really think that Eleven is ok?  I have yet to discover the merit 
in their music.  I saw them open for Pearl Jam in 1991 and they were 
unbearable and suffering through them three more times on the 
Superunknown tour was almost fatal.  Now they've lost the only good thing 
they had (Jack Irons on drums) to Pearl Jam.  Who knows though, I saw 
their first album in a used cd shop for $1...

On Tue, 1 Aug 1995, Muhammad Lee wrote:

> 
> 
> Ahmad,
>         I agree with you entirely that soundgarden will not be accepted as a
>         popmetal/rock band. Even if metal becomes the in thing I don't thing
>         that they will be accepted as a pop metal band. Their songs are just
>         not accessible, however my point was that Soundgarden did not make an
>         intentional move toward pop music they recent success was merely
>         because people liked there music, mainly black hole sun. It was a
>         great album anyway and they did not really join the ranks of the
>         mainstream alternative bands ie, Pearl Jam and Rem , weezer etc
>         actually I don't believe that bands like weezer and live are really
>         alternative music I think the music industry only classified it that
>         because it's the in thing. I personally only classify music as crap
>         and actual Music Soundgarden is actual music and there in that whole
>         alternative category so be it. Weezer is crap.
> 
>             P.s. Speaking of new bands check out a group called elleven they
>             released there self titled debut in 1993 and they opened for
>             soundgarden when I saw them live in 94' and they released a new
>             one this year titled Thunk. They are Pretty good almost as good as
>             (dare I say it) Soundgarden.
>           ******************************************
>             Tears Of The Feeble
>             Hands Of The Slaves
>             Skin Of The Mothers
>             Mouths Of The Babes
>             Building The Towers
>             Belongs To The Sky
>             When The Whole Thing
>             Comes Crashing Down
>             Don't Ask Me Why   -Soundgarden
>          *******************************************
> 
> 


------------------------------

From: Michael Barnes <MichaelB@humongous.com>
To: somms <somms@MIT.EDU>
Subject: RE: web site?
Date: Mon, 07 Aug 95 11:10:00 PDT


I am also intersted in this as well as the URL's for Pearl Jam and STP.

MichaelB@Humongous.com

*** pushing forward back ***
*********************************

 ----------
From: VASANT RAMAMURTHY
To: somms
Subject: web site?
Date: Monday, August 07, 1995 11:30AM

Does anybody know the URL of the Soundgarden web page?
 --
"Life's a bummer, when you're a hummer" - "Hummer" by Smashing Pumpkins
Vasant Ramamurthy
vman@ctdnet.acns.nwu.edu
Vasant.Ramamurthy@launchpad.unc.edu

------------------------------

To: Michael Barnes <MichaelB@humongous.com>
Cc: somms@MIT.EDU
Subject: Re: web site? 
Date: Mon, 07 Aug 1995 14:20:19 EDT
From: seth <saperl@MIT.EDU>

The URL for the Web page is http://web.mit.edu/saperl/sg/sg.html

seth


------------------------------

Date: Mon, 7 Aug 1995 14:35:02 -0400
From: Minerva657@aol.com
To: somms@MIT.EDU
Subject: fave bands

well, it seems everyone's sharing thier favorite bands...and so i figgured
i'd be trendy and all (heh heh) and follow suit---sooo, here goes--

soundgarden
rage against the machine
hum
the joykiller
smoking popes
the cure

and of course, there's my weakness for classic rock:

steve miller band
jimi hendrix
c.c.r.
jethro tull

blah blah blah......okay, there's my two cents--------danielle

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 07 Aug 1995 14:52:51 EDT
From: mrl5@Lehigh.EDU (Muhammad Lee)
Subject: Re: to pop or not to pop
To: somms@MIT.EDU



Well, I received some interesting replies to my post: 'SG is pop band &
other good bands', most of which were posted to the group.  In one sense I
must apologize for my being a bit over-zealous in throwing out a strict
definition of a pop band.  But by the thoughtful responses I received to it,
I think it was worth it.

Two of the responses are worth noting here.  Clown w/ Bazooka refined his
definition of pop band as those bands that create "prefabricated
commercialized fake music made for no other purpose then to climb the pop
charts."  I must agree those bands exist, but who creates the standards by
which these "pop bands" create their crap.  SG, in some sense, is a part of
that.
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Paul, what exactly do you mean by saying that Sg is part of the standards by
which "Pop bands create thier crap" do you mean that pop bands imitate
soundgarden, or do you mean that they are a performance measure by which crap
is decreed crap. I think that if you are going to decree a band a pop band
based on it's popularity you should look at other factors. Such as, are bands
being created in thier mold? ex. Stone Temple pilots a Pearl Jam Clone. Do you
hear them on the radio constantly and or on MTV even when they don't have new
material out? Are they on every talk show you turn on. Is MTV doing constant
specials on them that they find an excuse to show every week? ex. Pearl Jam,
Live, Rem , Nirvana . Do they judge the quality of their own work by how many
times it goes platinum? Have you seen everyone of their videos? I have been a
steady viewer of MTV for the past 6 or 7 months(theirs nothing else on) and I
have seen black hole sun mabye 5 times fell on black days once, my wave once,
I have yet to see spoonman, the day I tried to live or anything thats pre
superunk. I have seen all of nin's videos and nirvana's lives and Pearl Jams.
This is why I think that even though soundgarden is popular to some extent
they are nowhere near the pop followig of some of those other bands.

blind dog also threw in a challenge to my definition which brought up some
great questions which I must admit I cannot answer based upon my definition.
His suggestion was to "compare them to other bands, in a single band
fashion, so you don't get caught up in the big music movement."  Once again
I must admit this makes sense to me.

I guess I really posted 'SG is pop band' to see what you guys really think
about this labelling crap.  I've been confused by it for a while as in 'how
do you describe music to other people?'  Most people use the labels and if
you're on the receiving end, that might make the difference whether you ever
listen to the band.

I only listened to SG during their early Badmotorfinger days although I had
heard of them when they were opening with FNM for Voivod (way back when).
At that time though, someone said 'Oh, you like DRI (a short-lived period),
you'll like SG'.  I refused to listen to them since someone had tried to
label what I liked.

Oh, well, thanks for your replies.

- -Paul-


BTW, any women on this mailing list - I feel a bit guilty using 'guys' but
that's what I usually call everyone.



------------------------------

Date: Mon, 07 Aug 95 12:48:57 PDT
From: DKAASC@tevm2.nsc.com
To: somms@MIT.EDU
Subject: network tv sucks

*** Reply to note of 08/06/95 15:41
FROM: Kazam Ali
SUBJECT: network tv sucks

I have to agree with you fully. It was like seeing a really bad dj way
overstepping his boundaries in introducing a song.  The only full-length
video IN CONCERT played was Fell on Black Days.....That's it and 5
minutes worth of jerky interviews with the band. Their coverage of
Nirvana was pretty hapless also...one live video of About a Girl.Crappy

Kazam

"The key to immortality is first living a life worth
 remembering." - Brandon Bruce Lee
                           Feb. 1, 1965 - Mar. 31, 1993
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\

------------------------------

From: Michael Barnes <MichaelB@humongous.com>
To: somms <somms@MIT.EDU>
Subject: Louder than Love
Date: Mon, 07 Aug 95 16:54:00 PDT


Does anyone know whether they have released 'Louder than Love' as a 24 karat 
gold master CD yet (or if they will)? If so, do you know where I might 
acquire it?

Thanks

*** pushing forward back ***
*********************************
michaelb@humonguos.com

------------------------------

From: ADAMSON RICHARD J  <jra79@uow.edu.au>
Subject: Fave Bands
To: somms@MIT.EDU
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 1995 09:58:14 +1000 (EST)

Hi Guys/Gals,
A couple of artists I think are doing something interesting are:
YOUNG GODS (sampled metal/atmosphere)
PORTISHEAD 
TEA PARTY
YOU AM I (supported SG on US tour)
DIG (AUS not UK)
DANIEL LANIOS (Yes, U2's producer)
SMASHING PUMPKINS
DIED PRETTY

Your probably up on SP but check out the rest!
SEE YA,
RICH.

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 8 Aug 1995 10:19:44 +1000 (GMT+1000)
From: LITTLE JOE <s327857@student.uq.edu.au>
To: nicholas anthony budor <nickyb@engin.umich.edu>
Cc: Muhammad Lee <mrl5@lehigh.edu>, somms@MIT.EDU
Subject: Re: Not Pop!

On Mon, 7 Aug 1995, nicholas anthony budor wrote:

> Do you really think that Eleven is ok?  I have yet to discover the merit 
> in their music.  I saw them open for Pearl Jam in 1991 and they were 
> unbearable and suffering through them three more times on the 
> Superunknown tour was almost fatal.  Now they've lost the only good thing 
> they had (Jack Irons on drums) to Pearl Jam.  Who knows though, I saw 
> their first album in a used cd shop for $1...

Jack Irons a good thing..I find his drumming painfully bad and akin to a 
drum machine. If he was the best thing Eleven had, it would pay us all   
to steer clear of the rest of the band. IMHO the recent debacle whereby 
Pearl Jam lost Dave Abbruzzese and got Jack 
Irons, rates down there with the worst musical decisions ever made. 
Jack isn't worthy of shining the shoes of Matt Cameron et al, let alone 
drumming in the big leagues.
	    	       ___________________________
                      = ALIVE IN THE SUPERUNKNOWN =
	  	       ===========================                        


------------------------------

Date: Tue, 8 Aug 1995 10:40:44 +1000 (GMT+1000)
From: blind dog <s325961@student.uq.edu.au>
To: The Garden <somms@MIT.EDU>
Subject: anyone like jack irons?



	I think my friend littlejoe was a bit harsh in his critique of 
the new pearl jam drummer.  however, I do think that he was on the ball 
overall.

	jack irons, to me, is not much of a drummer.  I will admit that 
he does have one roll that I like, but this is his only one, and he plays 
it to death.  also, to move dave abbrusseese out for a drummer of jack's 
talent must certainly  be a slap in the face for such an accomplished 
musician as dave.

	I have a pearl jam bootleg ( it doesn't have a title), and they 
play a huge version of porch, a song I'm sure that just about everyone on 
this list has heard.  anyway, in the middle of the lead break, dave goes 
into this enormous cover of jesus christ pose.  the drumming is 
absolutely fantastic, and is spot on to say the least.  before I heard 
it, I would have been suspicious of anyone offering up another drummer 
than matt who could play it properly.  

	so, to cut a long story short, I'd like to hear jack irons play 
that same song.   in fact, I'd like to hear jack irons play any song from 
versus or vitalogy (except for the woeful stupid mop) with the same skill 
and ferocity that dave had.

	but then again, this isn't a pearl jam maililng list, so I'll 
stop there.

	justin

ps.	I'll be willing to bet that the songs on the new eleven album 
where matt plays are far, far better than jack's

                       -----------------------------------
                        a thousand doors, a thousand lies
                           rooms a thousand years wide 
                       -----------------------------------


------------------------------

Date: Mon, 7 Aug 1995 21:15:27 -0400
From: BluMijit@aol.com
To: alyberop@socs.uts.edu.au, pavr@umich.edu
Cc: somms@MIT.EDU
Subject: Re: SG is a pop band + Other good bands

hey! i resent being accused of liking pop! 
look at my list...how many of those bands are pop?
death metal , where i come from, is far from being popular....
bands like pantera, tool, therapy, etc. are...even though thay are cool.
anyway...
that's just my input...let me know....


the mijit

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 7 Aug 1995 21:23:01 -0400
From: BluMijit@aol.com
To: s327857@student.uq.edu.au, somms@MIT.EDU
Subject: Re: Fun!!

larrs ulrich...is it just me or >DROOL!< ?????

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 7 Aug 1995 21:24:33 -0400
From: BluMijit@aol.com
To: s325961@student.uq.edu.au, somms@MIT.EDU
Subject: Re: to pop or not to pop

uhhhh......ya......i will....

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 07 Aug 1995 21:33:54 EDT
From: mrl5@Lehigh.EDU (ClownWithBazooka)
Subject: Re: Louder than Love
To: Michael Barnes <MichaelB@humongous.com>, somms@MIT.EDU


Michael,
    I do not know if they have released Louder Than Love as a 24 karat gold
    Cd, but a good place to look for it would be in the J&R music world
    audio/video and cd catalog. However I do not know if it would be worth it
    I am a audiophile myself, but I am also an electric engineer and I do know
    that even with all the trouble they go through remastering the gold
    edition cd's the increased sound quality is inaudible even if you have a
    cd player with a 110 db+ signal to noise ratio. But if you're not looking
    for increased sound quality, it would make an interesting collectors item
    I would buy it myself. But if the sound quality is better (I doubt they go
    all out in sound quality for a debut metal album let me know.)
    Clown with bazooka



******************************************************************************

        ......Shower in the dark day
              Clean Sparks Diving Down
                Cool in the water way
              Where the Baptized Drown
                Naked in the Cold Sun
                Breathing Life like Fire
               Thought I Was The Only One
                But That Was Just a Lie......    -Soundgarden
*******************************************************************************

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 8 Aug 1995 12:35:19 +1000 (GMT+1000)
From: blind dog <s325961@student.uq.edu.au>
To: The Garden <somms@MIT.EDU>
Cc: somms@MIT.EDU
Subject: chris and the poppies

 On Mon, 7 Aug 1995, Paul Van Rompay wrote:

> Well, I received some interesting replies to my post: 'SG is pop band &
> other good bands', most of which were posted to the group.  In one sense I
> must apologize for my being a bit over-zealous in throwing out a strict
> definition of a pop band.  But by the thoughtful responses I received to it,
> I think it was worth it.
> 
> Two of the responses are worth noting here.  Clown w/ Bazooka refined his
> definition of pop band as those bands that create "prefabricated
> commercialized fake music made for no other purpose then to climb the pop
> charts."  I must agree those bands exist, but who creates the standards by
> which these "pop bands" create their crap.  SG, in some sense, is a part of
> that.

	is soundgarden really a part of the pop scene?  are you saying 
that soundgarden create the standards by which these pop bands create 
their particular brand of crap?  I would tend to disagree. I think that 
it is unlikely that there are any bands or psuedo-musicians around who 
could recreate the musical heaven that is soundgarden.  are they creating 
a standard against which all bands are measured?  I'd like to think that 
they are, but I also think that the music that I define as pop (stuff 
with synthesizers, programmed drum beats and a chorus that is used as a 
verse) would not define themselves by way of comparison to soundgarden.

	what got me thinking about this posting was an interview which 
was aired here in australia on radio.  chris made it clear when the dj 
asked him about bands that sound like soundgarden that there were no 
bands like that.  he said that it would be near impossible for another 
band to copy everything that soundgarden do musically, as they are such a 
diverse group of four that no-one could do more than mime one aspect of 
the soundgarden sound.

	so, in essence, I am confused as to what paul means when he says 
that soundgarden are a part of that (pop and its standards).  if someone 
can clear it up for me, feel free to post it to the group.  also, I agree 
again that labelling bands in terms of grunge, alternative or whatever is 
a bit fishy.  the ultimate way of doing it (and I know that it is 
difficult) imho is to define a band's sound in terms of their own music.  
I know that sounds ugly, but if you look at it real hard, comparing 
soundgarden to nirvana to the screaming trees to seaweed to mudhoney to 
the stone temple pilots and so on is not an ultimately cool way of doing 
things.  but then again, I guess its the only method we have.

	except for just listening to it.

	justin 

> 
> blind dog also threw in a challenge to my definition which brought up some
> great questions which I must admit I cannot answer based upon my definition.
> His suggestion was to "compare them to other bands, in a single band
> fashion, so you don't get caught up in the big music movement."  Once again
> I must admit this makes sense to me.
> 
> I guess I really posted 'SG is pop band' to see what you guys really think
> about this labelling crap.  I've been confused by it for a while as in 'how
> do you describe music to other people?'  Most people use the labels and if
> you're on the receiving end, that might make the difference whether you ever
> listen to the band.
> 
> I only listened to SG during their early Badmotorfinger days although I had
> heard of them when they were opening with FNM for Voivod (way back when).
> At that time though, someone said 'Oh, you like DRI (a short-lived period),
> you'll like SG'.  I refused to listen to them since someone had tried to
> label what I liked.
> 
> Oh, well, thanks for your replies.
> 
> -Paul-
> 
> 
> BTW, any women on this mailing list - I feel a bit guilty using 'guys' but
> that's what I usually call everyone.
> 
> 

                       -----------------------------------
                        a thousand doors, a thousand lies
                           rooms a thousand years wide 
                       -----------------------------------


------------------------------

Date: Tue, 8 Aug 1995 13:07:39 +1000 (GMT+1000)
From: blind dog <s325961@student.uq.edu.au>
To: The Garden <somms@MIT.EDU>
Subject: stickin' up for the boys



	what follows is a letter to the editor I sent about a month ago, 
before this list began.  it was to the editorial depatment of addicted to 
noise, an online music magazine which I am sure most of you out there are 
a little familiar with. 

	anyway, I was reading the day's music news, and the obligatory 
birthday piece at the bottom was on chris cornell.  I can't quite 
remember the date, but I think it was around the 19th of july.  I 
recommend that you all go and read the piece soon, so you can make up 
your own minds about it.  I thought that it was a little more than unfair 
to soundgarden.

	finally, my letter got a response from the editor himself (at 
least I think jaan is a male name!), and he was kinda apologetic.  he 
summed up by asking me if I wanted to write the birthday segment next 
time.  I, of course, said yes.

	so read on, fellow fans.

                       -----------------------------------
                        a thousand doors, a thousand lies
                           rooms a thousand years wide 
                       -----------------------------------

- ---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 1995 10:19:57 +1000 (GMT+1000)
From: Justin Nicholls <s325961@student.uq.edu.au>
To: Ilfryn Carstairs <s327857@student.uq.edu.au>
Subject: stickin' up for the boys, part II



	How is it that during your 'today's birthday' segment on Chris 
Cornell (july 19), you managed to incense two ardent Soundgarden fans?  
That's right, whoever it was who had the rather simple task of completing 
the artist/band synopsis of the day succeeded in plainly putting down the 
artist/band in question, namely Soundgarden.

	I read your online magazine quite regularly, and as luck would 
have it, the first article I see on my favourite group is a harsh 
critique with no real evidence to back it up.  I would have been quite 
happy to see a neutral and unassuming piece, as it is a birthday message 
after all.  I would have been equally as happy to read an album review 
with the same sentiment (although I doubt I'd agree with it).  However, I 
fail to understand why the two should mingle.  Especially since the 
phrase "never one for true musical diversity" is neither kind nor 
accurate.  How is it that a band can gain what you term "critical 
acclaim" without having more than one note to play?  I realise that I am 
no editor, but surely to disparage the performer and band in both the 
second and third sentences of a birthday notice can not be reasonable 
under any circumstances.

	But then perhaps our definitions of "one note" may differ.

	Thanks for your time, and understand that you have not lost a 
reader.

	You have only lost some respect in this reader's mind
	justin



	and there you have it.  too bad I didn't work on it a little  
longer!  maybe I was just trying to catch the anger I was feeling 
or something.
         
                       -----------------------------------
                        a thousand doors, a thousand lies
                           rooms a thousand years wide 
                       -----------------------------------




------------------------------

Date: Tue, 8 Aug 1995 13:11:33 +1000 (GMT+1000)
From: LITTLE JOE <s327857@student.uq.edu.au>
To: soundgarden list <somms@MIT.EDU>
Subject: 95-07-19.html#Chris_Cornell (fwd)


This appeared in Addicted to Noise's Music News of the World on Chris's 
birthday...Some birthday message hey...'never one for true musical 
diversity'!!!!!!!!!!!

  SAY IT'S YOUR BIRTHDAY: SOUNDGARDEN'S CHRIS CORNELL 
  
   [Soundgarden-cvr1] 
   
   
   Today is the birthday of Soundgarden's lead singer, Chris Cornell.
   Soundgarden has one note, and they play it with aplomb. Never one for
   true musical diversity, Soundgarden was responsible for making true,
   gutsy heavy metal hip in the underground of the late '80s. fueled by
   the primal sub-Sabbath riffing of guitarist Kim Thayil and the
   shrieking wail of the birthday boy, Chris Cornell, Soundgarden offers
   a revamped post-punk take on heavy metal. Soundgarden wormed it's way
   into the mainstream through a series of late '80s independent
   releases, culminating in a major label deal with A&M; their first
   major label album Louder Than Love, was released in 1989. Before
   Nirvana exploded down the doors for alternative rockers in general and
   Seattle bands in particular in 1991, Soundgarden had earned a
   following that was larger than any other Seattle band. But their real
   mainstream breakthrough didn't come until 1994, when the band released
   the critically acclaimed Superunknown. On that album Soundgarden
   expanded their primal metal into a variety of new musical territories
   without ever losing sight of the core of their music--their
   overpowering riffs. Superunknown. established Soundgarden as one of
   the most popular rock bands of the early '90s. It is also the birthday
   of Michael Anthony (Van Halen), Allen Collins (Lynyrd Skynyrd) and
   Brian May (Queen). 
   

------------------------------

End of somms Digest [Volume 1 Issue 8]
**************************************
